TowardsTheFuture

You mean… the literal focus areas of the great green wall is turning green after almost 20 years of work?

Like, yeah storms are pushing in where maybe they shouldn’t but also this is shit multiple countries full of people have been working at since 2007.

Yeah but where does BDG place it

Oh damn cool. Feels like ages since they announced it. Looking forward to trying it.

Oh wait is it actually releasing this decade?

You uh, do know you don’t just graduate and become a Supreme Court justice, right?

You also know most graduates change jobs in 2 years because they are basically forced to if they want to be paid.

47-55 seems to be pretty normal age to be appointed to Supreme Court. 18 years there puts you at retirement age. The youngest ever (32) would end at 50. For someone who gets there so young retiring early or doing whatever the fuck you want after sounds fine. Plus apparently that asshole is who we have to thank for the shaping the whole protect the rich and their property shit. Him only having 18 years woulda probably saved us a lot of bullshit.

Note: referred to as the “Democratic People’s Republic of Korea” (North Korea) instead of the “Republic of Korea” (South Korea).

While it’s still a pretty huge mistake it is at least not as glaringly obvious as saying North vs South, and those reading probably know them as N v S and not DPRK vs RK thus did not catch the mistake.

Still, goddamn dude what a fuck up. Both English and French.

Right? I was like uh… why we talking about women being wives like it’s a surprise they could accomplish something like the Olympics while still being married… OH WAIT YOU MEAN THEYRE MARRIED TO EACHOTHER AND COULD HAVE TO COMPETE AGAINST EACHOTHER. That’s way different.

Thats like 10-15 teachers full pay for those 18 years including benefits that just gets embezzled away.

Razed*

While I believe they answered well, the short being it being published doesn’t mean it is automatically science, there are plenty of shitty publications that care more about number of articles than ensuring good practices, and good peer review.

The point of what he was saying was that you need to publish it for it to be science tho, as science is there to build knowledge and increase our understanding, and not publishing does not allow that and thus is not science, even if the methods were good and the logic was sound.

If it’s not published it’s not science. The Contrapositive is if it is science, then it is published.

Not if it is published it is science.

Nah it was 2018 (with two others). Had to check if he has two, but nope.