this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2024
254 points (93.2% liked)

Fediverse

17513 readers
35 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (16 children)

@manucode @nutomic The thing is Wikipedia is losing user' trust because their decisions aren't always clear and some members are clearly tyrannic.

Maybe it won't replace Wikipedia, but maybe it will send a message to improve.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 6 months ago (13 children)

If you think a centralized organization governed by legalism is opaque, just wait until you see a thousand islands of anarchy.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 6 months ago (12 children)

No I think it would actually be great. You could peek at two opposing views on the same article, for example. I'm sure some "instances" would be ripe with disinformation but what's it to you? Idiots are already lapping up disinformation like candy. It's not like wikipedia isn't filled with it already...

[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You could peek at two opposing views on the same article, for example.

Post-truth as a service.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Post-truth as a service.

If you read through this page you might even conclude that Wikipedia itself is "post-truth"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Wikipedia_controversies

At any point in time you could be reading a defaced or propagandized version of an article.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)