Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

53792 readers

81 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others

Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

💰 Please help cover server costs.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

297

[Video] Disney creates best argument for piracy in a century (www.youtube.com)

submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

49 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 85 points 1 month ago (11 children)

Arbitration clause for wrongful death?

[–] [email protected] 71 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Yup. Because her husband got a 1 month free trial of Disney+. This is real and absurd.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

By no means do I agree with forced arbitration, but so many articles are reporting this partially.

They also agreed to the same clause when buying the tickets in 2023. It’s not just the streaming service ToS in play. Sure gets a lot of clicks saying it like it was though.

Again I think this is all horseshit and forced arbitration can get fucked, but it’s not being reported properly. The Disney+ trial could have not happened at all and the argument from Disney wouldn’t change.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c8jl0ekjr0go

Disney adds that Mr Piccolo accepted these terms again when using his Disney account to buy tickets for the theme park in 2023.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Restaurant wasn’t in a ticketed park. The tickets are as relevant as the D+ trial.

load more comments (3 replies)

load more comments (8 replies)