this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2023
8 points (100.0% liked)

/kbin meta

2 readers
3 users here now

Magazine dedicated to discussions about the kbin itself. Provide feedback, ask questions, suggest improvements, and engage in conversations related to the platform organization, policies, features, and community dynamics. ---- * Roadmap 2023 * m/kbinDevlog * m/kbinDesign

founded 1 year ago
 

This method only works within your magazine, and will remove downvotes or upvotes on comments as well as posts.

To implement it, go to Magazine Panel -> Appearance, and enter the following in your CSS box to remove downvotes:

{span style="color:#323232;"}.vote__down { display: none !important; } {/span}

and/or for upvotes:

{span style="color:#323232;"}.vote__up { display: none !important; } {/span}

Example with downvotes removed : @13thFloor

Many thanks to @Anafroj for writing the original CSS code, and suggesting it as a way to combat trolls. Note this test shows that standard CSS works in Kbin, but you do have to replace <> with {} to get it to parse properly.

This isn't a perfect solution, but it should mitigate the amount of users that try to sink communities through downvote spam.

Thanks to @some_guy and @cre0 for posing for the picture.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I agree for most magazines, it's pretty good as is.

However, for the one I run, it led to trolls spam downvoting in an attempt to hurt the community. As we're geared towards being a safe place for creators to post their OC and inspirations, this behavior was driving away potential contributors, and wasting my time having to ban downvote spammers who would come to the forum to trash OC without any intention of contributing or commenting.

I'm still weighing the pros and cons of making the change permanent, and I'll be observing how things go over the next few days (along with a community poll) to see if the effect is positive.

Regardless of how it turns out there, I did think that giving moderators the knowledge of how to implement the option was useful, especially for smaller communities that can easily be sunk by a couple of dedicated trolls.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I know your m.

It is your space and I understand the decision but I have unsubbed.

Personal opinion: Any place that blocks the ability to voice dissent is problematic, no matter what the reason behind it is.

Regardless of how it turns out there, I did think that giving moderators the knowledge of how to implement the option was useful, especially for smaller communities that can easily be sunk by a couple of dedicated trolls.

What do you mean here?

What does sunk mean?

I have seen and read pretty much every post on 13th and never noticed anything.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hi @Pons_Aelius - per my previous comment, the discussion thread is open here if you would like to participate further.

Side note, the two trolls I mentioned that led to this post, @cre0 and @some_guy showed up to prove my point with downvotes - they love to chase me around the Fediverse downvoting posts off the forum (been two weeks now - crazy obsessive compulsive disorder on display). It's actually a two-headed troll, as it appears that the accounts are sockpuppeting each other and downvoting within seconds of each other. Needless to say, I'd like to spare our contributors attention like this.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Your 0 contributors won’t have to worry about downvotes

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)