this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2023
2138 points (94.1% liked)

World News

38188 readers
1978 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago (42 children)

I really feel the pro-nuclear people here are misunderstanding the lack of regulation and safety requirements we had for nuclear. Many countries wont or cant follow these and that becomes a threat to our environment just as much as CO2. I absolutely agree nuclear is needed but the reason we got Chernobyl and Fukishima is entirely because corners got cut on safety.

Then we have the issue with waste storage. We already struggled during the 70s to 90s to store the waste. Some of it is toxic, as well as radioactive. Countries gave up and simply dumped it in the oceans in substandard containers which then leaked and caused massive environmental damage.

To get nuclear back we need those issues fixed first. Safety everyone follows, and storage principles everyone follows.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Norway (iirc, or some country near it.) Has been making a large containment facility in a deep mountain cave that would be able to store a large amount of the waste. The waste is actually pretty much a non issue at this point. I would much rather we start making more reactors now while we still have a chance, than be paralyzed with fear that the nuclear waste is gonna be some major crisis. It won't be, but the amount of pollution from NOT having the reactors will be.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 year ago (4 children)

It is really not a "non-issue"... jesus wept.

Have you heard of half life? Only France recycles the fuel rods (and at great cost). polonium, cesium and other chemicals are made and are toxic.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

High level waste is only about 5% of the total waste produced and the rest is low to moderately radioactive. The low stuff is safe within a week and the moderate waste is safe within a few months. Almost all of it can be disposed of normally after that like any other trash.

If you took all of the high level waste like actual fuel rods that has ever been produfed in the US since 1945 and put it all in one spot it would be about the size of an American football field.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (39 replies)