this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2023
74 points (100.0% liked)

Free and Open Source Software

17565 readers
5 users here now

If it's free and open source and it's also software, it can be discussed here. Subcommunity of Technology.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I think we have to consider that the principles of the free software movement, revolutionary though they genuinely were, were also set in the same mindset that latterly saw its founder Richard Stallman spectacularly fall from grace. They are principles that deal in software development and licensing in strict isolation, outside of the social context of their use. They are code-centered, not human-centered.

(…)

It’s worth considering whose freedom we value. Do we value the freedom of the people who use software, or do we also value the freedom of the people the software is used on? While the latter group doesn’t always exist, when they do, how we consider them says a lot about us and our priorities.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 51 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (12 children)

This is a conversation that needs to be happening, and not just around whether you are okay with the government using your work to kill people.

Are you also okay with giant corporations that have enough money to develop their own tools use your volunteer labor to profit wildly and harm the public? (Also, private companies make tools to kill people as well. Just look at Palmer Luckey's Anduril, which produces military-grade drones and such. Or hell, any company that makes Tasers.)

Because the story of Free Open Source Software is also the story of the biggest accidental transfer of wealth from the working class to the capital class in world history.

Amazon Web Services wouldn't exist without Linux. Sure, they run their own flavor of Linux, but they've put in a bunch of their own proprietary bullshit and AWS is a fucking juggernaut. A big reason they're able to do this is because they use off-the-shelf Linux as a starting base and work from there. It cuts out a massive amount of labor to just lean on the labor of volunteers.

Now, not all companies are like this, I'll admit. Valve pays people to improve Steam in Linux and has wildly benefited the WINe team.

However, the vast majority of private companies lean on the labor of FOSS volunteers to make money without investing the same labor themselves.

It's honestly kind of a fucking travesty.

EDIT: Also, it's a bit ironic that RMS always claimed that his plans with GNU/Linux was to free people from proprietary gardens, yet FOSS has actually been one of the biggest creators of such gardens. I always had a soft spot for RMS, but he's wrong as much as he is right.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

free people from proprietary gardens, yet FOSS has actually been one of the biggest creators of such gardens

Forgive the nitpick, but FOSS is not creating walled gardens, companies are. (After all, software has no willpower... yet)

load more comments (11 replies)