this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2024
8 points (100.0% liked)

politics

18866 readers
21 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Washington, DC – Vice President Kamala Harris says she will “not be silent” in the face of Palestinian suffering, as Israel’s war in Gaza rages on.

But Palestinian rights advocates want to know exactly what that means for United States foreign policy.

The vice president — and the Democrats’ likely nominee for the presidency — emphasised the plight of Palestinians in Gaza after meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Thursday. Nevertheless, she pledged ongoing support for Israel.

Activists say expressing sympathy for Palestinians without pursuing a meaningful shift away from the US’s policy of unconditional military and diplomatic support will not help Harris win back voters alienated by President Joe Biden’s approach to the war.

“Without an actual commitment to stop killing the children of Gaza, I don’t care about her empathy for them,” said Eman Abdelhadi, a sociologist at the University of Chicago. She stressed that the US bears “responsibility” for the atrocities committed against Palestinians.

“To be empathetic to someone that you’re shooting in the head is not exactly laudable. We don’t need empathy from these people. We need them to stop providing the weapons and the money that is actively killing the people that they’re supposedly empathising with.”

top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Some great quotes here.

To be empathetic to someone that you’re shooting in the head is not exactly laudable.

Unfortunately, Harris is kinda stuck. Even if she wins the election, Biden is still President until January. She can’t undermine his foreign policy too much.

I hope she actually does what’s good for Palestine once she’s in a better position to.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Right. So, I’m Jewish. What i want is for Harris to tell Netanyahu: “stop killing Palestinian kids for fucking nothing, or i will cut off all foreign aid to your shithole country”. But i will settle for weak-ass half measures because any incremental gain literally saves lives. She can play hardball later on, if there is some way for her and congress to undermine AIPAC. More than likely, that’s going to be a generations-long struggle.

Harris 2024. Fuck russia, including the republican traitor filth.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

How come no one that runs for president is ever as perfect as me.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

From a political perspective it's amazing how much of a lose-lose this situation has been for Biden and now Harris. Half the country is calling him "Genocide Joe" for supporting Israel while the other is calling him antisemitic for supposedly abandoning Israel. To be fair I think one side is arguing in bad faith and these aren't equally valid positions, but regardless not a soul in this country seems to be content with our current approach - even if it's intended as some sort of compromise.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Half of the country certainly is not - a very vocal but small minority are spamming the fuck out of social media saying that.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

My guess is that a lot of people don't even think about it because they're worried about making rent this month.

Don't get me wrong, it's an important issue. However, just because we're plugged in and paying attention doesn't mean everyone is or even can.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago

Only the biggest social movement since the Vietnam war. Must be Russian bots on social media right?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

It's not a lose-lose situation. Supporting israel is a loss because as we see they turn on Biden anyways by calling him antisemitic for wagging his finger a little bit while sending 2000 pound bombs for israel to drop on schools. Not supporting israel would have been a win.

Biden and the Democrats have not compromised. He is full on with israel on the Genocide side. There are no conditions to weapons, and the Biden admin lies daily that israel is not committing war crimes so they can violate Leahy law.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Withholding support to Israel would embolden the opposition here at home and have huge geopolitical implications abroad. I won't argue over whether or not it's the right thing to do, but I definitely wouldn't characterize it as a "win" for any US administration.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If we don't give Israel 2000 pound bombs to throw on hospitals it has huge implications abroad?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Unfortunately, polls on this issue have come up with highly varied results. So long as a very significant number of Americans support Israeli military action though, she will probably retain this half-half position, to not alienate older voters that tend to support Israel.

This will not be improved by speaking in support of hamas, claiming they are some sort of "freedom fighters" or anything like that, when they never allowed Gazans any freedoms.

A better idea would be to talk about encroachment of Israeli settlements and sanctioned violence in the West Bank under Netanyahu in defiance of the two-state solution proposed in the Oslo Accords (simply known to Americans from the time as the Israeli-Palestinian Peace Deal, negotiated during the Clinton years), and statements from prominent Israelis about the apartheid-like situation of Gaza over the years.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

This is not true. Polls have showed massive support for a ceasefire. Over 70% of Democrats.

Israel has never allowed Gazans any freedoms while they locked them inside of a concentration camp you mean right?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And both Biden and Harris support a ceasefire.

Do 70% of Democrats also support a complete cessation of all weapon sales to Israel? Or ending our diplomatic ties with Israel? Or even a two state solution?

This is a complex web of an issue. Support for a ceasefire does not translate to support for stopping weapons to Israel, nor anything else about the issue. Don't pretend otherwise

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 month ago

Biden and Harris do not support a ceasefire. If they did they would use their leverage to achieve it.

Words and actions are different don't pretend otherwise.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

70% of democrats supporting a cease fire does not mean Israel does not have significant support. Democrats are not the only voters she wants, she also wants independents and anti-Trump republicans. Cease fires can be temporary.

https://www.pewresearch.org/2024/03/21/majority-in-u-s-say-israel-has-valid-reasons-for-fighting-fewer-say-the-same-about-hamas/#:~:text=Views%20of%20the%20Israeli%20government,from%2012%25%20to%2021%25.

Neither hamas nor Israel allowed Gazans freedoms. Hamas has held power there since being voted in almost 20 years ago, and has never allowed another election.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yes the independents and anti Trump voters are also in favor of stronger also anti israel rhetoric. Which is what this article is about.

Not sure why you felt the need to paste some Hasbara at the end there. You sure don't seem to have an agenda.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The article did not say that anywhere, because it is not true. 30% of democrats are not even in support of a cease fire, by your own figure. This gets much higher among our conservatives.

I do have an agenda, I am against aggressive warfighters that start hot wars, and am in favor of self-determination and accurate information. This seems to be in opposition to your agenda, which appears to be simply anti-Israeli no matter what.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

No you do not call out israel for their brutal oppression you just keep bringing up Hamas.

Ergo you have a pro israel agenda not an anti agressor agenda.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

That's funny, if you scroll up just a little bit you will see my criticisms of Israeli settlements and violence in the West Bank.

I simply do not think hamas are some sort of heroes, when they are absolutely demons. The IDF fighting hamas is two evils fighting each other. Siding with either is picking your favorite evil.

edit because up and down are different directions

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Just pointing this out as a public service message. Linky is a well-known bad faith poster. Likely not even from any of the countries involved. And speaking from a position of extreme privilege. Hence why they can argue for unrealistic positions and against the best options we have. But not worry about suffering negative consequences from it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

I wish this was a pinned message.

Looked at post history and you aren't wrong...

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

A cop can never be trusted to be telling the truth. She's pandering to her base only for them to be let down again.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Who would you want to see as president (besides Bernie)

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 month ago

If given the choice, I would just assume Democrats and Republicans as a party dropped off the face of the earth.