this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2023
5 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

10162 readers
41 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The House passed an $886 billion military spending bill on Friday, with four Democrats joining Republicans. The bill contains several Republican amendments targeting abortion access, gender-affirming care, and climate policies. Progressives criticized the bill for allocating the largest military budget ever, failing to cut wasteful spending, and including amendments that attack women's rights, LGBTQ rights, and climate action. They urged the Senate to remove the "hateful measures" when reconciling the two chambers' bills. The bill's fate remains unclear as the Senate must still pass its own version and reconcile differences with the House bill.

top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

It's DOA in the Senate so might as well mitigate damage for Dems in red districts

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

All this talk of corpos and their precious quarterly record profits year after year but I feel like the military budget has been doing the exact same for much much longer

MIC go brrr

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Since Washington seems like a nice place for me to live I decided to look into Rep. Marie Gluesenkamp Perez's explanation for her vote in favor of this deplorable National Defense Authorization Act. She writes, "The bill also included my amendment to improve the military’s ability to fix its own equipment." Voting against human rights in order to get a right to repair seems like an absurd deal for anyone who actually supports human rights to make.