this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2023
233 points (97.2% liked)

Technology

58061 readers
31 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 15 points 11 months ago (4 children)

AI needs that's much power?

Fuck you, ditch it like a Zune and make some more video games.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I miss my Zune. Oddly enough, every person I've met who had a Zune had it stolen, including me.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago

And they only ever made one.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

Mine was never stolen, to break your streak. I had one of the little 4GB ones.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

Windows phones were nice, except Microsoft made them even more locked-down than iPhones...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The power consumption is factored into the cost of AI. It's still profitable after that, or they wouldn't be doing it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It's the biggest buzzword right now, it doesn't matter if it's profitable. I doubt most uses are directly profitable right now. It'd more of a FOMO situation - if we don't use AI, we're OBSOLETE! AHHH!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

If it turns out not to be profitable in the long run then people will stop.

Should we never even experiment?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Here's a nice video of a guy training an AI to do a relatively simple task (driving a Trackmania trac) with a very limited amount of inputs with low variability, 2-3 outputs and very hardset restraints.

Compared to what he does, a rather narrow defined re-enforcement training scheme, Microsofts AI takes many more inputs and has many more outputs and all the inputs are highly variable (massive amounts of data like dictionaries, images, movies, entire texts, speech, etc compared to a handful of parameters with values from -1 to 1) and also is a mix between re-enforcement, supervised and unsupervised training. With different subnetworks trained for different things eventually working together to do the master task they have in mind.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dw3BZ6O_8LY

What is shown in the video is what you'd do for a tiny subsystem of the AI Microsoft, Google, Apple and the like develop.

Kinda like if you watched a video about "this is what it takes to make the bolt that keeps your wheels on your car" you'd only have seen a fraction of what it takes to make the whole car.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dw3BZ6O_8LY

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.