this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2023
187 points (94.3% liked)

politics

18866 readers
21 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yes, the Laotians and Cambodians were definitely his own people. For sure. He's half Lao and half Camboian.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

While he was pissing around, 20,000 US troops died. I believe you're thinking of Nixon who was Commander in Chief.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

No I'm not.

The German-born political scientist joined the Nixon administration in 1969 as the president's national security advisor and was promoted to secretary of state in 1973. As the primary architect of the American bombing and invasion of Cambodia, Kissinger believed that these actions were necessary to prevent both Cambodia and South Vietnam from falling to communism.

https://www.pbs.org/frontlineworld/stories/cambodia/profile02.html

More here:

https://theintercept.com/2023/05/25/intercepted-henry-kissinger-cambodia/

https://theintercept.com/2023/05/23/henry-kissinger-cambodia-bombing-survivors/

Fucking sad how people don't know history that recent.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Lived it mate, and am well aware that his advice couldn't be followed without Nixon.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Sorry... you're saying he isn't a war criminal because he didn't make the final decision even though he planned the whole thing? Really?

Is Dick Cheney innocent despite being the architect of two wars that killed millions of people because George W. Bush had to say yes?

[–] [email protected] -2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

No, I'm saying he isn't the war criminal you think he is. Just as Dick Cheney, who can be accused of many things, didn't make the decision to invade Iraq. Bush did.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Are you really saying Dick Cheney isn't a war criminal? This is insane.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I said dick Cheney could be accused of many things, but giving orders to invade Iraq isn't one of them.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Except that's exactly what he did. He was the architect. Architects don't build houses, but it's ultimately their design. If something goes wrong with the design, it's not the construction company's fault. You seem to think that if a house collapses because it was designed to be structurally unsound, it's the fault of the person who bought the land.

There would have been no secret bombing campaign if not for Kissinger and we wouldn't have invaded Iraq without Cheney. They are absolutely, unequivocally war criminals.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It is the fault of the person who ordered the house built.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Because architects who design flawed buildings are blameless?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Now entering NaNa land.

The president is responsinle for the decisions made and the orders given.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

So absolutely no one else is ever responsible for anything that the U.S. ever does except whoever is president at the time. That is your assertion.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

If it's a military order from the President, no.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

So only 45 people have ever been responsible for anything the U.S. military has ever done?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Got it, so based on this, the Nuremberg trials were a great injustice and not a single Nazi official should have been hanged since not a single one of them was responsible for anything in WWII- not the war, not the Holocaust. Just Hitler. Solely responsible.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Nazis in Nuremberg were tried for crimes against humanity not war crimes. Different.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Ah, so Kissinger is guilty of crimes against humanity. Got it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Could be. The UN is the first place you have to get agreement, the the International Court. Go for it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Now you're trying to weasel out of the question. I think what this is actually about is you have some weird respect for Kissinger and don't think he did anything wrong when he illegally bombed two countries and killed thousands of innocent people.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

NO, I'm just getting tired of you. You're not bright but you make up for it by being persistent.

Kissinger is an asshole and always has been, but in the end his boss, Nixon, called the play.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Insulting me doesn't change the fact that you have spent a long time and a lot of effort trying to show how innocent Kissinger is. Maybe you aren't aware of that?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

But insulting you is so much fun. I will celebrate when Kissinger is gone the same way I celebrated Nixon's death.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

You think insulting people is fun, do you?

So basically you want Lemmy to be Reddit.

I'll have no part in that. Goodbye.