this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2023
786 points (97.3% liked)

People Twitter

4153 readers
332 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying.
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 37 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (4 children)

One of my biggest pet peeves is when critics judge a movie on what they think it should be, instead of what it’s actually trying to achieve. Sometimes it’s perfectly fine for a film to be big, loud, and nonsensical. Sometimes, a movie needs to be “complex” (although what critics call “complex” makes me think that a lot of them consider filmgoers to be idiots with the attention spans of goldfish).

Are there plenty of problems with any given popular film? Yes, but if it satisfies the audience it’s for, shut up.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I knew a dude that didn't like any movie that didn't teach him anything. That's fine. That's preference I guess no judgment... Until you had to work with him and listen to him drone on and on about how uncultured or unintelligent an animated Disney movie is for eight hours. Every now and then I see a review with someone complaining about how they didn't learn anything/the movie is too dumbed down and I wonder if he's still at it lol

[–] [email protected] 17 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Oppenheimer didn't teach me to build a bomb zero stars

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

But it did teach me to how to bag Florence Pugh, 7/7 erections

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Don’t get me started on To Kill a Mockingbird.

Nothing about tapping at all. SMH

[–] [email protected] 12 points 11 months ago

filmgoers to be idiots with the attention spans of goldfish

Why do you think big, loud, and nonsensical is so popular?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

I agree 100%. Before rating a movie I always ask myself if the team behind it managed to reach the goals they set for themselves. If all they wanted to make was a cheesy but entertaining slasher movie and succeeded, it can get the same score from me as some Oscar-nominated drama with a triple-A cast.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 11 months ago

Yeah but critics have to say good films are shit and shit films are good, because that way we think they're really smart and have some god-level insight that we're too dumb to perceive, so we keep giving them money to be smart while we carry on enjoying the shit films.

If they said good films were good and shit films were shit then we'd all go "well duh" and not think they're doing anything useful.