this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2023
294 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

10162 readers
78 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

NATO keeps Russia from invading NATO countries.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Are you implying that if the USA stopped projecting force globally NATO would continue deter aggression like it does now? I doubt that but I'm open to changing my perspective.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I am saying that the general statement about the US power keeping countries from invading is not true on its own, but that the multi country agreement that includes the US is the important part.

Sure, most of NATOs military power comes from the US, but the overall power comes from being a united front of multiple countries.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Are you claiming that the US doesn't contribute using the defense budget to NATO? Are you claiming the US had bases in Ukraine that failed to stop the Russian invasion?

Sorry for the question deluge, I just want to make sure I'm reading you right because I don't think either of those things are true...

Idk if I'm able to have an in depth conversation about this topic but I also don't want to get you wrong, you know?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

No to everything you wrote.

The US military power and reach on its own does not discourage countries from attacking other countries. Defensive treaties between multiple countries does, becsuse that allows for a united front that the US is part of.