this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2023
15 points (100.0% liked)

Australia

3463 readers
426 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @[email protected] who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @[email protected] and @[email protected]

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I don't usually post stuff from rip off news.com but this got me

“Those landlords might prefer to have a space sit empty rather than drop the asking rent, which would impact the value of their asset.”

That's broken af

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

You almost got it. It's related to treating tenants worse than your "cruelty free foodlot" animals, and then getting pissed off when they act like animals.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

The link between rental values and sales values is a real phenomenon. It would not be a landlord with a single property but with several properties in the district whose values they are trying to buoy.

I heard Marcus Westbury describe his Renew Newcastle project thus. His team offered low rent to corporations for disused shops in the CBD. They were playing go-between for creative types who wanted to start a novel business.

The corporations preferred to keep the shops empty so that the property value in the district would not fall.

Council wouldn't play ball either but for them the fear was not being able to reclaim the buildings when needed because of tenancy rights.

Ironically it was corporations who were more cooperative in the end. Marcus and his team hired a lawyer who arranged for a contract where the corporation would charge a tiny token amount (something like $50 per month) and the tenants would vacate with short no-cause (four weeks) notice.

CEO's enjoyed supporting quirky shops and the project revived the district, resulting in an increase in property prices (unfortunately spelling the end for most of the budding entrepreneurs but IIRC some were able to afford proper rent and continue).

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yeah I definitely think about this too. A string of vacant shops is like a cancer to a shopping strip: they just keep growing and growing in number.

OTOH if you lowered the rent temporarily to fill the shops, basically wouldn’t it be a case of a rising tide lifting all boats as you reinvigorate the area?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Shopping centres might do that or offer other incentives maybe like paying for advertising costs or something. If the shops are owned independently like the article's example then it's a bit harder because they need to cooperate.