this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2023
9 points (100.0% liked)

World News

22009 readers
105 users here now

Breaking news from around the world.

News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


For US News, see the US News community.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

From the article: *Large SUVs were particularly affected. According to the police, notes were attached to the cars indicating that they were harmful to the climate. The tyres were not punctured, but merely deflated. The cars were parked in the area between the S-Bahn line and Elbchaussee around Kanzleistraße. *

Personally, I like this protest way more than glueing themselves to the streets, causing traffic jams where cars burn gasoline for hours and ambulances / firefighters / police gets stuck, putting innocent life in danger.

The article is in German. Warning: this link leads to google translate.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

No form of protest is acceptable to liberals (let alone conservatives). When you peacefully protest, no one pays attention, when you damage private property, everybody screams, when you are disruptive while not damaging said private property, you're still a dick. So who cares, keep on going.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (5 children)

The problem is protests like these hurt working class families. Folks just trying to get by. In my area, you can’t exist without a car. If you want to protest do something that affects the decision makers. People like me have no power.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In the areas of Hamburg that have been targeted not one single person needs an SUV. We have reliable public transport that's easily accessible to wheelchairs or strollers as well. So yeah, it did target the right people.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

To what end? Do SUV owners write bills? Will inconveniencing nonpolitical randos get anyone talking about the issues, let alone talking about them without souring the discussion for climate activists, who now look like vindictive assholes?

This reads like petty vengeance against people with marginally larger carbon footprints and with the wrong kind of social performance, not genuine activism. If you're gonna slash tires, do it to the politicians ffs.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They didn't slash the tires, they just let the air out. No damages.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I would rather they slashed politician's tires than let out the air in random people's tires.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I mean...here we all are...talking about it. Some people are being more civil than others, but some people are genuinely attempting to discuss the role of individual responsibility in the face of catastrophic climate change.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure that Hamburg isn't such an area, and that SUV's are a totally unecessery folly there. This isn't hurting working class families. (Also, people like you do have power, organize)

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yeah, they should've thought of that before being too poor to buy multiple vehicles for each situation.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I'm going to assume that you don't know this so I'm gonna let you know: the targeted area is one of the most expensive to live in in Hamburg. And I'm going to repeat myself. Almost nobody in Hamburg needs an SUV.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

You think poor people drive around SUVs in Hamburg because they use them for work?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

they mostly target SUVs. Also people of higher income are way more likely to have SUVs and use them more often.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I wonder how many people on the receiving end even change their mind. I feel like if anything they'd completely reject the cause that is trying to be pushed, and the end result is a circle jerk between people who were already in agreement.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm a liberal, I can field this one. The form of protest I find acceptable is destruction of government and corporate property, but not working-class peoples' houses and mom-and-pop businesses. Is it really so much to ask to have rioting confined to productive activities, such as trashing city hall, looting Amazon DCs, destroying private jets and yachts, assaulting corrupt politicians, tarring and feathering billionaires, and burning down police stations? The establishment has successfully recuperated progressive protest by tricking people into associating it with low-level domestic terrorism, "we get what we want or maybe your houses burn down"; what we should be doing is repeatedly yanking the choke chain on the state and the 1% so hard their eyes pop out.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Trashing "city hall" isn't productive.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Let me just skip the implications and address your real meta point: no I am not a January 6 apologist or sympathizer.