this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2023
472 points (97.0% liked)

World News

38188 readers
1978 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That's exactly not my point. Population will naturally peak within the next decades and then probably settle around 10 billion. That's just 20% more than the current numbers.

None of the scarcities we're having right now are "real". As long as 60% of agricultural land in industrialized countries is used to produce animal fodder, there's enough food for everyone.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Just because it’s going to plateau and decrease, doesn’t necessarily mean that we aren’t already above where we should ideally be. Being potentially able to feed everyone is not the only criteria. We are overconsuming and this is in proportion to the world population. Even though it’s not evenly spread and everyone doesn't consume the same, at the end of the day the least people there are the least we consume.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

We don't "consume" that much. Actually, the only thing we actually consume is uranium, everything else is just transformed and could be recycled. Sure, there are problems, but you're basically advocating for auto-holocaust.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

Actually, the only thing we actually consume is uranium

Don't forget helium! Once that shit's pumped from the earth's crust and released into the atmosphere, there's practically no getting it back!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

We could be recycling everything but we’re not, and we’re not going to anytime soon, this would be far more complex than feeding everyone. I’m not advocating for anything, please don’t try to put words in my mouth. We’d have less trouble if there happened to be less of us, that’s it. I never said we should forcibly reduce our population, that’s ridiculous. I’m just tired of seeing this same senseless argument that everything is fine with the population because we could potentially feed everyone.