this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2023
181 points (97.9% liked)

World News

38188 readers
1978 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Sorry that I ask questions instead of accepting whatever. Claiming that you just need to throw X money at such an extremely complex issue and then it will be solved world wide is just laughable. As if there are no bad actors etc. pp.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Just asking questions about if poor people should have enough food to live or if that would make them breed too much, no fucked-up Malthusian undertones here, nossir

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That was never the point. The point is precisely that many poor people will NOT see the money/food/help just like all the times before now.

I also assume that, even if they miraculously really all get it, you will have at least one boomer generation, so more people per area that need to be fed. You then need to immediately get education up and running. Things then need to be stable for decades to make the fertility rate drop. It is not a simple "costs X then solved forever worldwide" kind of thing. It is also not something we can somehow "force" on them, at least not by throwing money at the problem.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Damn you're right, it's almost like we need to also restructure society in such a way that prioritizes human need and equitable access to resources and education on an ongoing basis, instead of the maximization of profits at the expense of literally everyone on Earth. It's a good thing the world isn't currently being ravaged by an economic order reliant on murder, starvation and inefficiency, otherwise this persistent handwringing about logistics and overpopulation would seem really strange and premature.

Like dude, no person or faction with the political will to go up against the forces keeping people in poverty is currently in any position to do so. We're talking about a make-believe scenario, and the fact that even then your mind goes immediately to "overpopulation" is mega sus and indicative of where your priorities are.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It is not whatever. I have provided a credible source for you for the numbers in another comment 6 hours ago. Please stop arguing in bad faith.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Yes, you did provide a source. But you are neither of the 2 people I replied to, so I am not sure why you tell me this out how it is relevant to what I said to this other person?