this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2023
76 points (100.0% liked)

World News

22009 readers
74 users here now

Breaking news from around the world.

News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


For US News, see the US News community.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

it doesn't actually reduce the use.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Please don't tell me you're gonna bring up the stupid soy fields in the rain forest argument :'D

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

being vegan doesn't stop soy from being grown in rainforests

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

exactly, because almost 100% of that soy is for meat production

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

85% of global soy is pressed for oil. the vast majority of the soy that's fed to animals is the industrial waste from that process.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Wheree do you get your numbers from?

https://www.statista.com/statistics/1254608/soy-production-end-uses-worldwide/

They seem off my guy.

Weird to not provide real numbers for someone calling me a liar

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

https://ourworldindata.org/images/published/Global-soy-production-to-end-use.png

i can't click your paywalled link

here's what the UN's FAO says

oil is 17.2%. since a soybean is only about 20% oil to begin with, you need to crush 85% of all soybeans to get that much oil. do you see how the vast majority of what is fed to animals is called "soy meal" or "soy cake"? that's the industrial waste from processing soybeans to oil.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Its statista, they limit traffic. Try a different browser.

Btw funny you link OWID, you should read their article. It doesn't mention the feed as a side product of oil production, and I'm having trouble finding your quote.

Even if its 100% true and just not mentioned in any articles on the matter, then I guess large scale veganism still only removes loads of industrial processes/co2 production, unspeakable animal abuse and insane amounts - and i mean ludicrous amounts - of wasted drinking water.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I guess large scale veganism still only removes loads of industrial processes/co2 production, unspeakable animal abuse and insane amounts - and i mean ludicrous amounts - of wasted drinking water.

that has never happened.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Exactly. Thats the problem.

Global consumption and production are increasing

Do. You. Follow?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

you can make any excuse you want. the fact is that being vegan has not helped the environment at all.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (3 children)

You seem to have a very tough time matching what people say/write and what you feel like they mean with it.

Let me rephrase the original claim so you may understand what the actual topic is you're so furiously debating: Reducing global meat production would be a net benefit to the planet and every being living on it in the long term.

Reducing demand for said production at a large scale WOULD (this is in conjunctive because it's still a small movement so IT HASN'T HAPPENED YET - we all know that) over time force said production to scale down.

Literally no human i have ever interacted with before you thought not buying a steak for a few months instantly fixes the world. We are painfully aware. Which is why we chose not to participate in that insane bullshit which causes all kinds of issues and harm anymore.

Thank you for your time and energy, this has been awfully unproductive.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Literally no human i have ever interacted with before you thought not buying a steak for a few months instantly fixes the world.

i never said that.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Funny how that works isn't it

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

strawmen? not really. it's exhausting dealing with intellectual dishonesty.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

when someone takes you at your word, and then you need to walk back your position to a much weaker claim because they point out that you are writing checks the facts don't support, it's you who is practicing intellectual dishonesty. compounding it with strawmen, and then rhetorically implying it is, in fact, the person who called you out who is being dishonest is the height of intellectual dishonesty. you should be ashamed, and you should edit the comments where you lied so as not to continue to mislead other users.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You still talking about the comment that I didn't write? Still implying causality you never proved? Cool.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

you keep waffling about whether you lied, but I assure you, you did. you've even owned up to it earlier in the thread, but now you're backsliding.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

this is deflection

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Reducing global meat production would be a net benefit to the planet and every being living on it in the long term.

that's true. what you said before was not.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Reducing demand for said production at a large scale WOULD (this is in conjunctive because it’s still a small movement so IT HASN’T HAPPENED YET - we all know that) over time force said production to scale down.

that's not causal.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

environmental destruction continues whether you are vegan or not.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

also what part of my comment prompted you to post that random response?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

yep due to the meat industry keeping going regardless of a fairly small demographic quitting their products

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

so maybe you should stop lying to people about being vegan helping the planet.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

It does, if enough people did it.

You're so angry lol

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

what makes you think you can tell anything about my emotional state?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Cuz youre lying about a very emotionally charged topic and calling me a liar. If you were not emotionally engaged, youd simply point out the data.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If you were not emotionally engaged, youd simply point out the data.

i've provided exactly as much data as you have.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

youre lying

everything i've said is true. you are the one who seems to want to bend reality to match your beliefs.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

everything i've said is true

It aint. Literally. U pulled 85% out of your ass. Try 4% (industrial use) 77% livestock feed.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It does, if enough people did it.

do you have a plan to make that happen? how many people is enough?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Are u moving goal posts to feel like you're winning something or genuinely expect the comment section in an online forum to solve societal issues?

Less meat produced = better.

How much more better things could be a different wat is irrelevant; using that as an excuse to never do anything is actually damaging.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, what does that have to do with veganism? Tiny niche doesnt stop global trend. Who knew?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Tiny niche doesnt stop global trend. Who knew?

you're the one telling people being vegan will help, but now you're admitting it doesn't. you should just go edit the comments where you lied about this and apologize to the people who might have been misled.