this post was submitted on 26 Dec 2023
207 points (88.5% liked)

Political Memes

5054 readers
1813 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

They absolutely were rebelling. There were soviets and peoples republics being set up in Germany in the aftermath from WW1 and the treaty.

And the fascist Freikorps units were also doing an armed rebellion. The SPD rolled over for them then set them with military support against the KPD.

The story for the SPD is erroneously thinking they could use and control fascists to suppress communism and enable their political will.

The story for the KPD is erroneously thinking they could use and control fascists to suppress the SPD and enable their political will.

Looking at one and not the other in this historical scenario as to how the Nazis came to power is exactly how the fascists come to power.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

And the fascist Freikorps units were also doing an armed rebellion.

I don't think you understand the post-WW1 Freikorps if you think that they were ideologically fascist or rebelling as a whole. The Freikorps were a vast and varied collection of unofficial paramilitaries that weren't even associated with one another. While generally nationalist, they ranged ideologically from conservative monarchists to staunch SPD supporters. Most Freikorps units didn't even persist past the chaos of 1919, for fuck's sake.

The SPD rolled over for them then set them with military support against the KPD.

The idea that the SPD 'rolled over' for the Freikorps (which the SPD-controlled government was instrumental in disbanding after the establishment of the Reichswehr) is... just not backed up by evidence. Have you forgotten that a core reason for the Kapp Putsch was that the Weimar government was disbanding various Freikorps units?

Keep changing what you're arguing, and maybe you'll come across a goalpost you like. Like claiming that Freikorps that were SPD partisans were actually fascists, because we all know that's the 'social fascist' bullshit you're pushing here. "B-both sides!"

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

The Freikorps were what? Largely nationalists who were SPD supporters or conservative monarchists?

Why yes. That's kind of conveniently accurate here. Thanks for noting that prominently.

The Kapp Putsch directly led to the ruhr uprising, at which point the Freikorps were absolutely used with the Reichswehr against the communists. So the causes of the Kapp Putsch are rather overshadowed by the results and aftermath.

After 1919 the Freikorps were largely dissolved, but more importantly the ones that remained rebranded into organizations like the S.A. The architects of the Holocaust were this kind of Freikorps: like Himmler, Bormann, and Heydrich.

So really: Is it really offensive to note that empowering fascism for whatever reason is a bad idea that just empowers fascism?