this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2023
212 points (94.2% liked)
Technology
58061 readers
31 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Reading the article it seems that they are not trying to block AI, they just want their fair share of the IP if their likeness is going to be used.
Seems completely reasonable to me. This shit is going to get weird if we declare that no one has the right to their own image. Imagine you get scanned and then all the sudden your face or one that looks almost exactly like it starts showing up in a bunch of pornos.
That doesn't make much sense either tbh. That's not how AI works. It literally learns from past experience so how do you attribute this? If I go to a louvre and with that inspiration paint a painting who do I attribute? It's impossible to determine "who's likeness was used".
Honestly I think this AI ignorance is why the writers/actor strike will fail.
Copyright maximalists is not the answer to the externalities if AI.