this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2024
172 points (97.8% liked)

Selfhosted

38707 readers
677 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

What are you using as a Google photos alternative? Currently I'm using Nextcloud but I'm thinking of switching to a more dedicated solution.

I mainly need to upload photos from my device automatically, have an UI to see and classify them, albuns and sharing.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 116 points 8 months ago (18 children)
[–] [email protected] 40 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Thread is over, because this is the only correct answer.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Interestingly only one or two years ago, people seems tp recommend PhotoPrism

[–] [email protected] 29 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (5 children)

Yep, until PhotoPrism revealed themselves to be the greedy cunts they are.

I sponsor my favourite tech projects annually, as I believe in supporting independent and responsible open-source development.

I became a paid Github sponsor for PhotoPrism because they promised features like multi-user were coming, and they indicated that paid sponsors would get access. After what seemed way too long a wait, they finally released the features many of us had been waiting for, only to stick them behind a monthly paid subscription. For self-hosted users. 🤨

So, I switched to Immich about 6 months ago. I've found Alex and the rest of the team to be very active, and quite responsive to support requests, including on Discord. Additionally, the development is fast-paced and new features are coming all the time.

My money's going to Immich. PhotoPrism can go get fucked.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

only to stick them behind a monthly paid subscription. For self-hosted users.

holy shit

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Nah. The Premium model is kinda bullshit. As a free tier open source user you will always be a second class citizen.

Also everyone who wants to commit code has to sign away his rights for them.

tl;dr maintainer gets money from open source contribution over the premium tier, but hinders everyone else to do the same with the AGPL licence.(kinda)

That's not a good foundation to start off.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

So you think it is bad cause others can't take their work and make money off of it? Seems to be a real problem in open source right now that others are doing exactly that and something I don't begrudge a small development team doing.

Not affiliated with them just been using and happily subscribed for a year+ now. Better than Google getting my money.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

No, i think it is bad that the owner takes away the rights from the contributors.

AGPL alone does already solve the problem.

But both, is not sustainable.

Also the trademark owner can relicense the code anytime and just close the source. It is not community project

I think many developer feel like me. Just look at the contributor list on both projects.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

That's a fair point. I think you are right that it is not a community project. Something for me to consider. Thanks for the response.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago

Immich iirc has seen huge and rapid development in the past two years so no surprise.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Definitely Immich.

There's a lot of these kinds of services, hosted or self-hosted that are labeled as a "Google Photos replacement"

But very few of said services have features like face matching and object recognition alongside automatic backups.

IMO it's not a legitimate replacement for Google Photos without those features and Immich really delivers on that without compromising your privacy.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Hi is there a guide for Complete Newbie like me , right from how to download this software(I could not find link or anything resembling.exe for installation,) upptill how doninput it on my zorin os laptop and setup my and my familys phone to upload photos to our own laptops via immich. Like a a book idiots guide to xyz... Kind of thing

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I think this is hard to answer because there's no "one way" to do this.

Do you want it accessible only in your house, and you're running something like a raspberry pi? That's one set of instructions.

Do you want it accessible from anywhere in the world, with proper TLS? That's a little more complicated, and there are a million ways to do this


do you want to self host and expose public IP? Self host using a VPN as the entry point? Host on a VPS?

I would recommend playing around with it first. This is easiest if you can get a well-supported environment, so something like a raspberry pi is best IMHO if you want to play around with minimal frustration.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Hi thanks for your reply. I have laptop with external drive that i use as server at home. Ideally as easy part1 i would only upload pictures home, and would access them home only. This is not a public intelltual property, it's our photos so no public IP needed.

What i am looking is

My and familys phones are getting full of pics and videos, so instead of using Google Photos can we upload it our own server at home easily and wirelessly. If need be we can watch them on tv . That's it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

“IP” in this context means “internet protocol address”. A public IP is one that can be accessed from outside your home (what you see when you go to https://whatismyipaddress.com/). A non-public, or internal, IP is the one your router gives your computer, frequently starting with 192.168. This can be accessed by other computers on your network but not from outside your network.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

It's not a Windows app.

You can run it on Windows with Docker, but I would suggest a Linux server and a reverse proxy for the best experience (like most self-host solutions)

The installation documentation is here

And here

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Looks interesting. Just wondering if anyone has tried Mylio which also looks promising and has many tools for de-duplication and tagging which I quite like in Google Photos.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

In this community anything that isn't open source is not going to be relevant to the majority. It sure does look like a competent product though but I question it as an alternative to Google since it's going to be tough to survive when one is pre-installed and automatic without any user intervention on pretty much every android phone and the other I hadn't even heard about until now and I've researched alternatives...

I think they'd be smart to make their free version open source to assuage the concerns about risking that the product dies and all tagging etc becoming useless / wasted effort. Even though I understand the reluctance because the primary motivators for going premium aren't really open source compatible (pay for more devices etc.)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

I get what you're saying and usually I would prefer open source myself. However, Mylio has self hosting facility as well as end to end encrypted cloud storage option too. Does seem like a good product.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (4 children)

It is great, but the mobile app becomes slow AF when I import all my google photos which are thousands of them. Even after indexing has finished.

Edit: Scratch what I said! Just gave Immich another shot, and the slow mobile app was due to the initial background sync running.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

How many photos? It's a very good user experience for me, with 123GB library (23k+ photos, 1k+ videos). Fairly entry-level Samsung phone and iPhone 13, both work great.

Running on an Orange Pi 5 Plus.

Absolutely love Immich. Was previously running on an RPi 4 w/4GB RAM, but with the other services I had on there I needed to disable ML. Orange Pi 5 Plus (16GB RAM) and it's just a dream. Kicked off ML/facial recognition before bed and it was done in the morning. Migration from RPi to OPi was straightforward.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

What is different about an Orange Pi compared to a Raspberry Pi? Thinking about taking the plunge into self hosting and I'm looking for something easy and powerful.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Big difference for me between the RPi 5 and orange pi 5 Plus is more RAM and m.2 NVME support on board. It also has four additional efficiency cores and dual 2.5G NICs, but that's less important to me.

Downside is it has a less polished ecosystem.

Overall though I've been happy! But I also love my collection of raspberry pis, so it's a matter of taste I guess.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

Yep, Immich is tha bomb! Able to completely clear out google photos!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Holy shit, this is incredible.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It really is. I absolutely love the shared link functionality, with the ability to easily set an expiration date and manage existing shared links.

It's made taking pictures a lot more fun for me.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

It even recognizes my Pixel "Top Shots!". It's like I just drag and dropped Google Photos into my server! 🤯

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Anyone has a working nixos config for immich? I don't get the containers to communicate with the host database.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

For virtualization.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

Because it's easy. For other services I use nixos containers, but for immich Docker was just so simple

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

Pleased that I came to this thread looking for a good answer, clicked this link and opened in my preferred browser for project tracking and saw it was already starred in GitHub. Guess I need to actually deploy an image finally and stop lurking for an answer. Lol

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I've been on my 3rd install of linux mint and immich. I can't seem to make it work. I can't mount my second hard drive so immich can see it. I'm gathering up a strength for the 4th install.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

Hey, not sure how in depth your linux/docker knowledge is. Please disregard if irrelevant. I would recommend you pick a fixed mountpoint for the drive and set up a systemd service to mount the drive for you (systemd .mount file). Then you add an extra line "RequiredBy=docker.service" (look for systemd RequiredBy) This way the drive always has to be mounted by the system before docker is started and should always be visible before you start a container.

Hope this helps :)

load more comments (9 replies)