this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2024
294 points (91.1% liked)

politics

18866 readers
21 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 11 points 7 months ago (2 children)

It was a pro-abortion rally. Probably not the best moment for a pro-Palestine protest.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

lmao, really!? The "it's not appropriate" argument?

Please let the protestors there know when they can reach Biden in their home town at a more reasonable occasion.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 7 months ago

Should people hold a pro-choice protest at a rally to support Gazans, shouting over the speakers? It's not convenient but after all that's the argument right? Disrupt every possible occasion?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Because women having their rights taken away deserves attention too. They interrupted this rally to target Biden, when there's plenty of other places for them to do that.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

You mean like the Palestinian women having their right to exist taken away?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Because there's probably a good amount of overlap between people who are pro-abortion rights and those who are sympathetic to Palestinian rights. Abortion rights are also an important and immediately critical issue domestically, so interrupting a rally to support those who need access to abortion with a pro-Palestine protest is just going to piss off people at the rally who are already on the side of the protest. It'd be like if a group of pro-choice advocates started a protest at a pro-Palestine rally, it's just bad form when the group they're disrupting probably agrees with them.

I get the protest was targeted at Biden and Harris, but even still, it's a bad idea to protest them at an event that is probably for an issue the protestors also care about. It just signals that there's no reaching the protestors and they're going to be unreasonable, even if Biden comes around to their side and stops shipping arms to Israel.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Yeah! If you want to protest, do it somewhere that will cause no disruptions whatsoever! /s

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

I love how we're all so stuck up our own asses that people actually think it makes sense to hamper any sort of attempt at progress because it's not perfect. This is the same exact shit as single issues voters in the Republican party over guns or anti-abortion. So focused on one thing that they can't even understand they're hurting themselves.

Maybe this isn't you exactly, but it's what your comments rhetoric represents.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

Protests should absolutely be disruptive. What they shouldn't do is occur at events to support different marginalized groups. Protesting an abortion rights rally is fundamentally different from shutting down a highway. It's like having anti police brutality protest disrupt a pro asylum rally. How does it help to disrupt an event for an issue the protestors probably support as well?

Again, I get they were there to protest Biden, but do it when he's at a random campaign event, not when he's at an event to support a marginalized group.