this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2024
636 points (96.2% liked)

News

22528 readers
2253 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

I love Kyle Hill/subbed. It's fair to say though that he's very pro-nuclear. Not discrediting what he says, just saying he definitely has a certain perspective on it.

And my primary criticism is on the catastrophic failure problem, and while I think the storage problem is a negative as well, I think it's less so than the catastrophic problem.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

And my primary criticism is on the catastrophic failure problem

That's the weaker argument in your original post. Modern designs are nowhere near as bad as older ones designs (aka soviet, we all know you mean Chernobyl) and even the older non soviet ones aren't bad at all

Fukushima is nowhere near Chernobyl levels of damage (didn't destroy things for miles for centuries), and no other major plant failures that I can think of would match "catastrophic failure"

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

That’s the weaker argument in your original post.

Well I mentioned waste first as I did that as a tongue-in-cheek response, but then I immediately mentioned in the very same comment the catastrophic issue, and my recent comment is just me elaborating on the fact that I gave one more weight than the other. It doesn't discredit what I'm saying.

Fukushima is nowhere near Chernobyl levels of damage (didn’t destroy things for miles for centuries), and no other major plant failures that I can think of would match “catastrophic failure”

Fukushima exclusion zone is not large enough for you to consider that a catastrophic wide area failure? Really?

Modern designs are nowhere near as bad as older ones designs

I'm already commented on this, but just to quickly repeat myself, there's a difference between being on the design board and being in existence in production.