this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2024
202 points (91.1% liked)

Technology

58061 readers
31 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

you don't have to lose your social graph to move instances though. mastodon has had account migration for years, now.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Lemmy doesn't, since it's not part of the protocol, and in both situations you still lose your actual id.

In general, there's technical reasons why ids and instances are associated on Lemmy / Mastodon, but not UX reasons.

99% of users just want a username, i.e. @bigCommieMouth, they don't necessarily want their identity tied together with the server they use to interact with the network, i.e. @[email protected], and if they did really love a specific server and wanted their identity tied to it, they could always just make @bigCommieMouth_kolektiva_social.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

>there’s technical reasons why ids and instances are associated on Lemmy / Mastodon, but not UX reasons.

...right...

>99% of users just want a username,

literally 100% of users have used this system regardless of the fact that identities are tied to services.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

So? 100% of users never used the fediverse before it existed. Bluesky / ATProtocol is now offering an alternative where usernames are not tied to instances, and that sounds like a better UX.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

If you don't want to discuss the relative merits of Bluesky, don't participate in a thread on Bluesky.

bye

[–] [email protected] -1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

i thought this thread was about me correcting misunderstandings about activitypub software. i have no interest in bluesky until/unless they either aferro gpl their code or implement activitypub federation. there are no merits to their network that i can see unless one or both of those come to pass.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

i thought this thread was about me correcting misunderstandings about activitypub software

I don't see a title saying "self post: let me correct you about the activitypub protocol", I see a link to Bluesky launching federated storage.

there are no merits to their network that i can see unless one or both of those come to pass

Then don't engage in a discussion about their identity system, just post a blanket comment saying "they suck cause they're not open enough" and leave the thread. The rest of us are here discussing the relative merits of one protocol vs another.