this post was submitted on 29 Feb 2024
388 points (98.7% liked)

World News

38188 readers
1978 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Woods argued the “dirty secret” is that customers weren’t willing to pay for the added cost of cleaner fossil fuels.

In his comments Tuesday, Woods argued the “dirty secret” is that customers weren’t willing to pay for the added cost of cleaner fossil fuels.

Referring to carbon capture, Woods said Exxon has “tabled proposals” with governments “to get out there and start down this path using existing technology.”

“People can’t afford it, and governments around the world rightly know that their constituents will have real concerns,” he added.

“So we’ve got to find a way to get the cost down to grow the utility of the solution, and make it more available and more affordable, so that you can begin the [clean energy] transition.”

For example, he said Exxon “could, today, make sustainable aviation fuel for the airline business. But the airline companies can’t afford to pay.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago (2 children)

respectfully, how is it our fault that oil, that has been around for more longer hence it is more, cheaper than renewable alternatives?

[–] [email protected] 22 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Not to mention that these bastards knew something had to be done decades ago because they themselves looked into it but they used that early warning to delay, delay and delay, so they could continue earning maximum profits down to the last second, and then a good few years past that.

And what the fuck is this guy smoking? "Clean" fossil fuels? No, you realized your business would not survive in a world where this problem gets dealt with, so you actively sabotaged the ability of your own species to pick up on the problem.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

This is an old tactic, and it's been used by the oil industry before.

Plastics are polluting our environment? "It's not the industry's fault. It's because individuals litter and don't recycle. No need to have the government regulate the industry."

If they can convince people that it's their fault, then there is no need for industry to change.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

Even if it were 100% the case that this was the fault of individuals, sounds like the government should be regulating the industry to cease producing plastic for which it's a problem if people litter.