this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2024
729 points (98.4% liked)

Science Memes

10348 readers
1881 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children)

Kilonewton? That would be a force and not a mass. For mass the standard unit is (kilo)grams.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

LBS is Imperial Pounds which is a measure of Force and not Mass. That is why your LBS fluctuates based on gravity but your mass doesn't. So they are correct.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

I see. Okay. Didn't know that.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 6 months ago (4 children)

Weight is a force and it's not mass. Weight is measured in Newtons.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago (2 children)

We are not talking about the weight force here. We are simply converting pounds-mass to kg. If you dont believe OP meant the mass (whicg Im sure he certainly did) then aks him but when saying something weighs a certain amount then one is usually referring to its mass.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (2 children)

We were actually talking about Force, though. Pounds is a force, not a mass. I am OP and I meant force because I'm assuming the animal lived on earth. If I wanted to specify mass then I would have used Slugs, the Imperial unit for Mass.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Could you provide any source that states that a pound is a unit of force? Because the American National Standard Institute (here), aswell as Wikipedia and numerous other sources claim its a unit of mass.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (2 children)

The article you linked to does not mention at any point that LBS is a mass, or at all uses the word mass at any point throughout. In fact, it breifly at the end mentions "1 lb=0.45359237 kilogram" as well as "1 Newton=0.224809 pound force" which could indicate a difference between LBF and LBM distinctions.

It's commonly understood that you will weigh a different amount of lbs on the moon than on earth. Because it isn't a mass. It's a force of gravity.

There is also evidence in the form of lbs/in^2 being a common measurement, which would be completely nonsense in the context of mass.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

I love educational threads like these.

Even though the original point was "using international standard units makes it clearer for everyone"

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Yeah it is pretty fun.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Alright, lets look at the US Customary Units and their definitions. Here is the section called "Mass and Weight". As you can see, everything is defined in metric units of mass. You won't find even pound-force to be part of the Customary units. I couldn't find any source saying that pound (not "pound-force") is a unit of force. However, there was an agreement (I think in 1955) to define the pound in kg.

it breifly at the end mentions "1 lb=0.45359237 kilogram" as well as "1 Newton=0.224809 pound force"

That basically implies that lb (pound, imperial unit) is a unit of mass and "pound-force" (non-imperial unit, part of the British Engineering Units) is a unit of force. Thus, pound (on its own) is a unit of mass, right?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

British Engineering Units are not a part of the US-Imperial System, but since I never specified I suppose it's a good argument.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Did you take into account that earth was heavier millions of years ago? Also, you would have to specify where on earth it weighed that amount.

Anyway, pound is an imperial unit for mass, just like slug. The "pound-force" is not part of the imperial units, jut rather of the "English Engineering Units" that differentiate between pound-mass, pound-force, pound-foot and others.

"Pound" is not a unit of force in ANY system. If you really meant force (I doubt that) you should have used lbf. Anyway, noone cares how many Newtons of force the earth exhibited on that animal, all the metric-using people in this thread are interested in its mass. All scales used to weigh something display kg (or pounds), so units of mass.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The dino would need to be even lighter if the earth was heavier because the force of gravity would be higher, but in general differences in gravity across the earth's surface amounts to a rounding error. For example, you're probably looking at 2000 ish miligal from the top of a tall mountain to sea level difference in gravity, or .02m/s^2 difference.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

From mountain to sea level yeah but the difference between Equator and North Pole is almost 1% because Earth is not a perfect sphere.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

Thank you, apparently most people here don't understand the difference.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Agree. The error is in the imperial system, there isn't a difference between weight and mass. The Weight depends on the gravity but the mass not. 240 Pounds Weight on Earth are on the Moon 40 Pounds Weight, but the Mass is still 240 Pound. Because of this in the SI system for the Mass is used kilogramm and for the Weight Newton (old kilopond)

[–] [email protected] -5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children)

But weight is gravitational force not mass. These are deeply related but not the same because us customary is based on pre Newtonian measurement systems

[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 months ago (2 children)

If you say that something "weighs" something, that's a description of mass, not weight, because the wording is from before a time when it was understood that mass and weight are different things.

All has been said that needs to be said, bloody pedant.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

I was mostly just joking. Of course we use lbs as pseudomass. Fuck, we’ve moved to lbm vs lbf in America because mechanical engineers must be stopped and metricated by force if necessary. We’re a spacefaring species that’s advanced enough to have planetary gravitational maps, of course mass is what we should be using. But also weight as force is just kinda funny to use outside the myriad times you actually need to in engineering

[–] [email protected] -1 points 6 months ago

Specifically LBS is a force, though. Imperial Pounds is not a mass measurement, so converting it would be a better equivalent to Kilonewtons.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 months ago (1 children)

This has the energy of an 11 year old who just learned what weight is in physics

[–] [email protected] -2 points 6 months ago

Or a middle school physics teacher that barely knows what they're talking about.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago

Us customary defines the pound to be a unit of mass. Thats all you need to know.