this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2024
44 points (100.0% liked)

Australia

3463 readers
426 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @[email protected] who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @[email protected] and @[email protected]

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
  • In short: One of the first cashless gaming trials in NSW found the technology made little difference to the behaviour of gamblers.
  • The Wests New Lambton trial has received criticism from gambling reform advocates, who say it did not include a card with binding and default limits.
  • What's next?: The Independent Panel on Gaming Reform will provide findings from an expanded statewide cashless gaming trial.
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Nah, get rid of cash for the pokies. It alone won't help with harm reduction but the pokies are one of the most common ways to launder money in this country. People use the resources taxes buy and should be paying their fair share.

We also need cashless gaming cards with default and settable hard limits with restrictions on when you can change it to help combat the addictions.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah, I get it.

But I reckon the real tax cheats.- sorry, I mean tax minimisation! - aren't the ones putting cash through pokies. They are using companies, discretionary trusts etc and various tax jurisdictions to avoid -oops! I mean minimise!- tax.

Whatever happened as a result of the Pandora Papers? Nothing. Because it's basically all legal and the way the rich evade - oops! I mean minimise!- tax.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

It's both, stopping one doesn't mean you can't stop the othet

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

@ephemeral_gibbon @No1 I'd rather get rid of the pokies completely

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Oh absolutely, but an improvement is still good. Pokies are absolutely shit and should be ripped out, but it'll be harder to get that to happen.