this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2024
54 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
37573 readers
576 users here now
A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.
Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
🤖 I'm a bot that provides automatic summaries for articles:
Click here to see the summary
Musk's lawsuit accused OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and President Greg Brockman of drifting away from its original nonprofit mission by forming a for-profit subsidiary later.It also claimed that OpenAI breached its founding agreement to make notable AI advancements freely available to the public.
"To this day, OpenAI Inc.'s website continues to profess that its charter is to ensure that AGI ‘benefits all of humanity,'" the lawsuit read.
"In reality, however, OpenAI Inc. has been transformed into a closed-source de facto subsidiary of the largest technology company in the world: Microsoft."
Musk had previously requested a 10-day jury trial that sought an injunction and maximum punitive damages, but OpenAI had denied that he was entitled to any relief.
OpenAI had objected to some of Musk's discovery requests for confidential information—with both sides arguing over terms of a protective order.
Saved 67% of original text.