this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2024
145 points (98.0% liked)

politics

18866 readers
21 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I must admit that I got scared when Biden noped out of the re-election.

I'm just glad that Kamala seems to be bringing the unification the dems need.

Get her the nomination already! And people, people, people, don't do a Hillary and become complacent. Get out and VOTE!

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Anybody that feared Biden dropping out needs to re-evaluate the way they look at politics. This has been a long time coming, and has been an inevitability since 2015 when Democrat party leadership decided they could pull a fast one during the primary. Before we even knew Biden would be that incumbent, the shape of this election had already been decided.

Now that Biden has dropped out, the Democrats have a chance. A lot of future history depends on how well Harris can turn the support for "Literally anyone else" to her advantage.

Edit: I seem to be getting a lot of downvotes for my objectively correct assessments of politics. Seems to me like y'all are either mad that I was right, or Republicans who are mad that Biden dropped out.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Anybody that feared Biden dropping out needs to re-evaluate the way they look at politics.

In what way?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I don’t know. It’s been pretty clear for a while that the traditional Democrat strategy of winning by courting centrists and staying the course has been less and less effective every election. Tapping into enthusiasm for leftist policies and energizing the base to increase turnout has seemed like the better move for a while. That’s what Obama won big on and then completely failed to deliver.

Staying the course with the “nothing will fundamentally change” candidate was always a path to losing, and after his disastrous policy on Gaza we were in a nosedive.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

That’s what Obama won big on and then completely failed to deliver.

Bro, Imma stop you right there. The GOP shut down the government under Obama TWICE for no reason other than being the little shits that they are and don't hide nowadays. So, don't drive this "Obama did nothing" nonsense narrative. Also, ACA. Even the Republicans benefit from it right now.

Now moving on, I still don't see what is there to re-evaluate for the people who feared that Biden dropped out. Hindsight is 20/20, and it's very easy to say "ha, you were wrong!" after the fact.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Obama didn't do nothing, he bombed like 9 countries and bailed out the banks after they halved black wealth.

I can't say whether the ACA was better than nothing because I still can't afford healthcare.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Which state do you live in?

And are you working at the moment?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Currently in SC and between jobs, but before I got laid off, I stopped putting money into the HSA and using any kind of healthcare after I saw how much doctors visits, dental, and routine blood work drained it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Sorry that happened to you, man. I've been there.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Thanks, I managed to put some money aside so I'm not in immediate financial straits.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago

Leftism isn't a real thing. It's just a feeling.

In a political campaign always want to offer an optimistic future. As we've seen with Biden, it doesn't really matter if he makes the most pro-union policies in history, join picket lines, protect social programs, and only fail to increase minimum wage because his party didn't have enough votes. "Leftists" don't care about policies, it's entirely an emotional thing.

It's easy enough to understand. The leftists that voted for Obama became more centrist as they got older. The leftists of today are young people who only know about Obama from wikipedia and what they're told by politcal grifters on youtube and tiktok. Being young they're emotional and low information voters.

Harris offers the same "Hope & Change" feelings that Obama did. Which policies get implemented will be dependent (as always) on which party controls Congress. By the end of her first term hopefully enough of the low information emotional young voters will have more information and be a little more capable of critical thinking to vote for her again.

Also Gaza has nothing to do with leftism, it's actually a war between a democracy (Israel) and a fascist regime (Hamas). It just feels leftist LOL.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'd been getting shit on for years for trying to tell people Biden would have to drop out to give the Democrats a chance this election. Lo and behold, once he finally does, Democrats are suddenly on track to win.

Everyone who didn't understand that this was going to be the case had their heads buried too deep in the sand to hear any of the legitimate, well intentioned criticism of their preferred candidate or the arguments for why switching would be a good thing. Such folks who accused me of being a Republican or a Russian bot when I was actually right cannot be trusted to perform political analysis.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You still haven't said in what way people who feared Biden dropping out need to re-evaluate the way they look at politics.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

They were afraid of a thing that would significantly improve their electoral chances because they were too wrapped up in their support for a presumed nominee to put their biases aside and consider the benefits of switching to another candidate.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Your sentence comes down to: "Their biases made them afraid of considering better options."

Specifically what biases are you talking about?

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Not a single person voting Democrat does so because they thought Biden was a great candidate.

It appears nobody has learned anything from Hillary's loss in 2016.

Establishment ghouls are not popular Democrats. Conservatives will vote Republican anways, appeasing to the right is worthless.

Only progressives get independents to vote blue.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Not a single person voting Democrat does so because they thought Biden was a great candidate.

This is where you lost me. As if boomer Democrats are not a thing. But let's keep on reading...

It appears nobody has learned anything from Hillary’s loss in 2016.

Lost me again. I don't know why people keep forgetting about 2020.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's unlikely that they forgot about boomer Democrats. Many of us have parents or grandparents who qualify. I can't think of a single person who told me how great of a candidate Biden was. I don't remember anyone who was extremely excited by the policies he wanted to enact. Of course I can only talk about people that I met, my friends and family and community.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Were it not for Israel, I'd be telling you about how great Biden has been domestically (except the boarder). His administration has by and large been very progressive with the policies it's enacted. Biden's abhorrent sucking up to Israel during an active genocide is the huge dark spot on his presidency.

It is a bit dumb that "he's too old" is what got him out.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Biden won marginally because he was marginally better than Hillary and was the Obama guy.

Bernie would have won by a landslide.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

That's a hell of a prediction for someone not even from the US.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Not a single person voting Democrat does so because they thought Biden was a great candidate.

Tell me you're unaware of his achievements as president without telling me...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Propagandists are fully aware, and choose to ignore said achievements as it fucks up their narrative.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I am aware Joe Biden is complicit in Genocide and performed like a senile geriatric on CNN.

Tell me you don't live in America without telling me.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Who are you to call someone out on not living in America? lol

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So you don't live in America.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I've never been disingenuous about where I live. MI my whole life except 5 years in VA. Those are states, in case you're not familiar with them.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

How am I supposed to believe you if you dont post your social security number?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I mean, no one knows you're from America either.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Oh, they aren't. That was established the other day. Which is why it's so disingenuous for them to be calling someone else out.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Who has established that, you?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 month ago

Did you find the Unabomber?

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 month ago

How are they supposed to believe me if I don't post my social security number?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I understand it's hard to see a whole picture when onde side of a single issue occupies 100% of your brain capacity

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Some people find it a little hard to ignore Genocide. Good to see the average Democrat has no issue with it and willingly admits it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Some people find it a little hard to ignore ~~Genocide~~ murdering babies. Good to see the average Democrat has no issue with it and willingly admits it.

The same logic and reasoning as conservative single issue anti-choice voters, it's good that America is healing its divides.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Comparing the need to Genocide brown children to need for abortion is a new low. Blue MAGA in full force.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I wasn't comparing the two issues. I was comparing your single issue voter approaches, which are the same.

Do you not see the similarities in how you argue for your "one true cause" justifying being a single issue voter?

Also, do you have a reason to call me blue maga besides pointing out that being a single issue voter means you have like-minded brethren across the aisle, or is it just because I disagree with you?

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Trying to not start WW3 does not seem like a single issue to me but to each his own.

The escalations that have been warned for 9 months are getting closer and closer and Biden is sleepwalking us into a nice big war.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Ah, so when confronted with evidence of being a single issue voter, you now claim that Israel/Palestine is not a single issue.

No, buddy, you've conveyed that you're fine with ignoring all of the administrations other actions and policies, choosing to zero in on this. That's being a single issue voter.

At least the conservatives are honest with themselves. Though I guess some can mentally delude themselves into thinking "I don't think preventing the genocide of the unborn is a single issue.". You can lead a horse to water but you can't make it drink. I'm likely not not going to convince an account with 6000+ comments on the same issue to change your mind, and you clearly have much more free time than me, so I'm just going to stop here.

Have a good day!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

Ah yes the "single issue" of foreign policy.

Is Project 2025 a single issue too?