this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2024
27 points (100.0% liked)

Open Source

30218 readers
368 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Basically, what the title says. Do you use any app, that is proprietary, but either has no OSS alternatives or they're all not good enough? If there is an alternative, what keeps you from switching?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

A keyboard with swipe typing, multilingual autocorrect and speech to text support that actually works.

Other than that, my only proprietary apps are from commercial services I use and pay for (banking, Spotify, Carsharing and public transport). I'd love for them to become open source, but it's probably not ever gonna happen, cause they rely on verifying my identity.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I've had a good experience with HeliBoard

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Japanese has been an open issue for months now, so it's a nope from me.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I went with FUTO Keyboard. It's the only keyboard that ticks all my boxes to replace GBoard so far.

I wish the swiping predictions were a bit better though.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Does the futo keyboard allow you to paste content yet?

I briefly used it but found the lack of content pasting too much of a hindrabce.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

Has options for pasting, and even a clipboard history feature? Although have not enabled that or tested it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

FUTO keyboard is proprietary.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

It is not. FUTO calls it "source first" which just means "open source but with rules against bad actors". Certainly far from proprietary.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If the license doesn't meet the OSD and does not protect four freedoms, then it is not open-source.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It is by FUTO's definition.

Jokes aside, I find that attitude not very healthy. Whether you want to call it open source or not, as I said, it's far from proprietary, and certainly more than just source available. Dismissing it for that reason is quite unreasonable.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Jokes aside, I find that attitude not very healthy.

Calling a source-available license "not proprietary", this is what not very healthy.

"Source-first" or "fair code" are just a fancy ways to say "proprietary".

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

It is not open source, because it does not meet the definition of open source.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

Have you tried openboard? Admittedly it doesn't the text to soeech