this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2024
134 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37573 readers
539 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The U.S. administration is cracking down on cheap products sold out of China by companies such as Temu and Shein by saying that companies are no longer exempt from tariffs simply by shipping goods that they claim to be worth less than $800.

U.S. President Joe Biden would no longer exclude these “de minimis” imports from tariffs under a proposed rule released Friday to tax all imports if they’re covered under Sections 201 or 301 of the Trade Act of 1974, or Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962.

Importers mainly from China have used the de minimis exemption for shipments of $800 or less to flood the U.S. market. The number of these shipments has jumped from 140 million annually to over 1 billion a year, according to a White House statement.

The action comes at a delicate moment for the world’s two largest economies. The United States has tried to lessen its reliance on Chinese products, protect emerging industries such as electric vehicles from Chinese competition and restrict China’s access to advanced computer chips. For its part, China has seen manufacturing and exports as essential for driving economic growth as it has struggled with deflation following pandemic-related lockdowns.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 28 points 5 days ago (2 children)

The land of "free market" is a joke lol

[–] [email protected] 38 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (4 children)

You can’t freely compete with near slave labor conditions and zero environmental regulations. . .

China makes the US look like the EU in comparison for those things.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 5 days ago

No but it does show how much capitalism relies on the absolute exploitation of the labor market and the double-standards from the US in that regard. Free market good but only when US companies are the ones fucking everyone over.

  • US companies buying cheap stuff from China and marking it up 500%: good, American values
  • China cuts the middleman and sells the same product for the same price they would sell it to the reseller: noooooo we can't compete with that, China bad, it's so unfair! Waaaaaaa

At least the EU doesn't constantly brag about muh freedom and how the free market is the best thing ever and you're a commie if you don't agree that capitalism is the best.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Yeah pretty damning for how bad China is if that’s considered better.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 days ago

A little older article regarding Foxconn, but should still be relevant.

Not that it helps that Apple and others are enablers of these practices.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

Didn't workers make that exact argument when their good manufacturing jobs were being sent to poorer nations? Seems hypocritical that the government allows globalism to hurt the working class as long as it benefits the rich, but suddenly globalism is bad when it hurts the profit margins of our billionaires.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago

arkansas' use of prison labor seems like it's trying to compete on the near slave labor front

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 days ago

Whatever we understand by a 'free market', China must really not complain about a 'non-free' market policy not in the U.S. nor in most othrr countries. That would really be hypocritical.