this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2023
308 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37573 readers
539 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Eh I don't think it's malicious in nature but can't prove it either is or isn't. They might be doing more analysis on some outbound links or users for something or just A/B testing some additional methods for gathering more data. Unsure. But I wouldn't immediately jump to intentional.

[–] [email protected] 60 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If adding some analytics adds 5s to the load time, then they need to fire their developers.

There's no way this is accidental.

[–] [email protected] 56 points 1 year ago

That's kind of the problem, they did fire their developers.

[–] [email protected] 50 points 1 year ago (1 children)

with that asshole in command? Uhm...

Every bad decision there is intentional

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

i think you should read the replies to the hackernews post, there's some interesting discussion there with more nuance. particularly the thread started by user "kens"

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But I wouldn’t immediately jump to intentional.

occam's razor says you should ;)

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But Hanlon's razor says you shouldn't.

All right, we got a razor fight!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hanlon’s razor says you shouldn’t.

yeah, but that applies to a problem where you don't have any additional information. if you do have background information of any kind, you would be wise to take them into account.

All right, we got a razor fight!

my razor is ready, bring it on! 😆

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

The fact that specific domains and user agents are effected by this says otherwise. Take a look in the link for people discussing curling the urls and their findings.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

It's Elmo.

It's definitely malicious in nature.