this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2023
1539 points (97.1% liked)

Technology

58061 readers
31 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 77 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Back to the high seas it is.

I'm not paying for 5 streaming services to watch 1 show on each. So now I'm paying for no streaming services.

Convenience as a reasonable price was the deal. It it neither convenient nor reasonably priced any more.

Cable TV all over again. Region locked DVD all over again.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

What do you mean?

It's never about providing good service, and always about cashing out.

And that always works.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

I'm with you on the high seas ever since Star Trek bounced around from place to place. When you're thinking "uhhh which do I watch this particular spinoff on, is it Netflix or Amazon Prime or..." it's already too much like hard work. Then they decided to make the latest exclusive to Paramount, yet another subscription. Eh, nah, at that point it's time to make like Tascha and Yarr it.

However in part I think the comparison to cable (or would've been Sky here) is psychological. With those big services you're still effectively paying to watch a few shows a bunch of different "streaming services" (channels/networks in that case) but as it's all bundled up into, say, £60/month, you don't think about it. Or, the average person doesn't - personally I've never justified that much to watch TV. Now that it's split out into different payments, £10 here for service A, £10 there for service B, the waste of paying so much to so many different services just to watch a few shows becomes more apparent.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Streaming services are doing the whole weekly episode releases rather than block releasing a series.

Another way they are trying to retain customers.

I ain't got time or money to wait for your weekly episodes, man.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This is one thing I actually like them doing. I'm a social watcher and also have other things to do; I want to talk about an episode with friends afterwards, and the phenomenon of racing to binge watch an entire series in one or two sittings ruined that. (As well as forcing me to stay away from half the internet until I've binged the series myself due to spoilers). I don't like being "forced" to binge, much rather savour it one episode at a time as it's produced, really take in and enjoy and discuss the details of each one. Really makes you appreciate it more IMO.

I see your financial argument though, I guess you could wait until a series is over and then subscribe for 1 month and binge away. Or, of course, yarr.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Back to? Son, I never left