this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2023
196 points (95.8% liked)
Asklemmy
43340 readers
2067 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- [email protected]: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Statistical modeling.
And yes, I am miffed about the use of the word “exponential” in this post’s title.
Same here; what're the odds?
About 50/50. Either you are or you aren't.
But what are the exponential odds?
50^2 / 50^2
I'd approach it logically.
If 50/50 = you are / you aren't
Then
(50/50)^2 = you are are / you are aren't / you aren't are / you aren't aren't
Applying the locig gates AND : 25%. OR : 75%. XOR : 50% NAND : 75% NOR: 25% XNOR : 50%
The results average at 50/50.
Likewise, so higher than we thought lol.
the base of my exponential function is 1