this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2023
665 points (97.3% liked)

World News

38188 readers
1978 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The advanced S-400 ‘Triumf’ air-defence system was destroyed in a joint operation by Kyiv’s security service and navy, Ukrainian intelligence sources said The attack off the coast of Yevpatoriya was orchestrated through the aerial drones and Neptune domestic missiles, Ukrainian official Anton Gerashchenko said

Ukraine used drones and missiles to take down an advanced Russian air-defence system worth US$1.2 billion early on Thursday, according to multiple reports.

The advanced S-400 “Triumf” air-defence system was destroyed in a joint operation by Kyiv’s security service (SBU) and navy, the BBC and Reuters reported, citing Ukrainian intelligence sources.

The attack off the coast of Yevpatoriya was orchestrated through the use of aerial drones and Neptune domestic missiles, per Anton Gerashchenko, a Ukrainian official writing on Telegram.

Yevpatoriya is a coastal city in the west of occupied Crimea, which Russia seized from Ukraine in 2014.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 121 points 1 year ago (11 children)

Why does every news article nowadays repeat itself at least 2 times? There are almost the exact same sentences twice. You don't even have to read past the abstract because there is no other information at all in the actual text. And besides, you avoid having to scroll past 7 gigantic ads

[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 year ago

SEO, AI generated content

[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I’m so happy. I thought it was just me noticing this. I really dislike when the headline is the headline, summary and first paragraph. By the time I get to the substance of the article I’ve read the first paragraph three times.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago

I think it's because the first paragraph is usually preview content for news aggregators and search engines, so it's used as an appetizer.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Probably stems at least in part from the essay format a lot of us were taught in school.

Intro: tell em what you're gonna tell em

Body: tell em

Conclusion: tell em what you told em

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You probably got taught wrong. At least that’s not what I learnt (early 90s);

Intro: what’s the problem? Background stuff.

Body: here’s a solution and what else we looked at

Conclusion: tie back solution to problem and what further stuff we could talk about.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Less right vs wrong than just the way it was done. It's the product of word/page requirements that encourages us to fluff the everliving fuck out of our papers.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I also remember being taught this way. It's why you have people that say "in this essay I am going to tell you", which is, of course, bad.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah it's not exactly a highlight of academia.

I took a technical writing course in college, and it delivered the best lesson of any English course I've been in:

Assigned your standard 3 page essay with little instruction. Do it, hand it in. Get a grade and the paper back. Next assignment: write that same essay, but this time in 1 page. And again, but this time in a single paragraph, using bullet points to summarize the main ideas.

"...and that's how you write a work email. Remove ALL the fluff. If it takes longer than 30 seconds to read, it's probably not going to be read."

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Because they don’t care about quality in depth content. They’re just in it for the clicks. Probably had an algorithm fill in the remaining paragraphs

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Did you ever have to write a paper in school with a minimum page or word count?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

I like it. Most other articles on internet today made on purpose super long to show you 5090 ads even before you get to the first main point.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Ah, I think you just answered your own question. Articles gave a lot less substance in the age of information. "News" outlets still need ad revenue even if they don't employ journalists any more.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You answered your own question

Ads

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

And it's also 2 day old news

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Also what's up with the the fact that I need to scroll more than one page down on (even on full-screen 1080p) to get to the actual article? I should be able to begin reading it immediately, and it should appear the top of the webpage. I really hate this horrible UX on "modern" websites.