Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
Ah yes, the well-known, reliable, unbiased source known as jewishpress.com.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-jewish-press/
Analysis / Bias
The Jewish Press publishes both original stories and republished articles from other sources. News is focused on the USA and Israel with an emphasis on the Jewish Community. Articles and headlines are often straightforward and not overly biased, such as this Iran Reports Sunday Morning Accident at Natanz Nuclear Site. Stories are sourced properly.
Editorial content is found under the blog section. The Jewish Press leans right with articles such as this 60 Minutes Deceptively Edits Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis To Push Blatant Smear Job, and this Emes Ve-Emunah: Will Identity Politics Destroy Us? A review of op-eds reveals moderate right-leaning bias; however, news reporting is factual.
Overall, we rate the Jewish Press Right-Center Biased based on editorial positions that moderately favor the right. We also rate them High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact checks record. (D. Van Zandt 3/1/2017) Updated (12/13/2023)
Far better than AlJazeera that gets posted here.
Really? How many Peabody awards has it won? Because Al Jazeera has won four.
That still does not change the fact they are biased, very much against Israel and owned by Qatar where free speech is not a thing.
You said this source is "Far better than AlJazeera that gets posted here."
I just showed you that Al Jazeera has won one of the world's top journalism awards four times. What are the accolades jewishpress.com have gotten? Because this post was literally the first time I had ever heard of them. You clearly know about them, so please do tell me about their journalistic bona fides.
It's odd that you care so much about Al Jazeera's ownership and biases but have said nothing about jewishpress.com's ownership and biases. Are they bias-free and owned by an unimpeachable company? Do tell me since you must know.
No, they definitely aren't ideal but they still have better rating and less bias than AlJazeera.
The fact you win journalism awards does not equal not being biased. Take this example: A person/organisation can win contests despite being biased and spreading misinformation. The fact I spread anti-vax propaganda (I don’t, take it as an example), does not disqualify me from winning a biology competition.
they still have better rating and less bias than AlJazeera.
From whom? Let's see these ratings and compare them.
A person/organisation can win contests despite being biased and spreading misinformation. The fact I spread anti-vax propaganda (I don’t, take it as an example), does not disqualify me from winning a biology competition.
Once again, you seem totally uninterested in jewishpress.com's possible bias. Why is that?
You can check mediabiasfactcheck or wikipedia to see inaccuracies in AlJazeera. Or just look at their recent articles to see what I am talking about.
Jewishpress is also slightly biased (but to the right), however much less than aljazeera. Also, it is less factually correct.
You didn't say anything about inaccuracies. You said bias:
That still does not change the fact they are biased, very much against Israel and owned by Qatar where free speech is not a thing.
Also, Media Bias Fact Check does not say Jewish Press is "much less" than Al Jazeera when it comes to bias. In fact, their bias levels are about equal.
Did you not actually think I would check?
I, of course, thought you would check. The fact that their left/right bias is about equal is true. Issue is how AlJazeera reports a lot of bs (such as not recognizing Hamas as a terrorist organization) in terms of this conflict.
Hence it is extremely biased against Israel and you can easily check it by continuing in the article. That’s why I consider it completely irrelevant or at least less relevant than jewishpress.
What you said:
they still have better rating and less bias than AlJazeera.
Then you directed me to a website which said they have the same amount of bias.
So either you didn't think I would check or you didn't check.
Yes, they are less biased than aljazeera. What you are talking is only left/right wing bias.
Yes, they are less biased than aljazeera.
The source you told me to look at says they have the same amount of bias. This seems to be a "what are you going to believe, me or your own eyes?" situation.
Of course, believe your eyes. But don't forget to look deeper and understand that there is not only right/left wing bias.
And that bias is usually also affected by the factuality of reporting.
You said one was more biased than the other. You have yet to show that is the case.
Here you go then:
From mediabiasfactcheck.
That still doesn't show that it is more biased than the other source. That just shows that it has a bias, something no one has denied.
Such a report does not exist for jewishpress. They also have a higher factual score than aljazeera, and so forth we can assume they are less biased.
We can not assume any such thing.
You made multiple statements saying it was more biased as if it were a fact. You also said that site would prove that it is more biased.
Now you are admitting it doesn't prove it. I gave you plenty of chances and you kept moving the goalposts and pretending you didn't say something when I even copied and pasted you saying it.
So you've been dishonest this entire time.
I don't think we need to continue this conversation. I'm not interested in talking to people who construct elaborate but obvious lies.
We don't have to keep continuing this discussion. I have proven several times that aljazeera is being more biased and less trustworthy source than jewishpress. It’s very evident from checking sites like mediabiasfactcheck that aljazeera has a lot of bias. Such comments are not present at the report for jewishpress.
To me it seems like you just refuse to believe that something jewish can be trusted more than aljazeera despite being provided with thorough evidence.
I'm Jewish, genius.
Goodbye.
Same here.
How do you think they got this story wrong?
Because it's not hard to verify that some US Senators really are calling for strikes on Iran.
US Senators regularly call for strikes on Iran.
So a typical Sunday for Lindsay?
Lol is his lying ass ready to go to war?
No. But he's ready to fight till the last drop of everyone else's blood.
Literally anything happens
BlameIran.mp4
Is this America's new "Iraq did 9/11 and they have WMD's we must invade them trust me bro"?
Yes because we have such a stellar track record invading middle east countries ...
So, Republicans want to warm up Diego Garcia when they can't get a bill out of the door.