this post was submitted on 29 Feb 2024
635 points (99.5% liked)

politics

18866 readers
21 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

An Illinois state judge on Wednesday barred Donald Trump from appearing on the Illinois' Republican presidential primary ballot because of his role in the attack at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, but she delayed her ruling from taking effect in light of an expected appeal by the former U.S president.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 73 points 6 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago

I didn't even need to click on this. :)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

pause at 27 seconds and you'll see DeSantis's uncle/bro/cousin behind the main guy

[–] [email protected] 50 points 6 months ago (2 children)

This doesn't even matter. Unless he's barred from the general election ballot, he's already won the GOP primaries. Haley just won't cave until she's forced to.

[–] [email protected] 51 points 6 months ago (13 children)

Please read the article, it's for both the primary and general.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Haley just won’t cave until she’s forced to.

Haley is clearly staying in for the likely reality that Trump is found guilty and the small chance that the Republican party chooses not to have a convicted federal criminal as their candidate. She knows based on the numbers she has no shot, but she's angling to stay in so she can swoop in when Trump is disqualified.

How likely that is to happen to up to interpretation, but it's pretty clear at this point that's Haley's game plan.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

Haley is clearly staying in for the likely reality that Trump is found guilty and the small chance that the Republican party chooses not to have a convicted federal criminal as their candidate

And because Trump is old and unhealthy and could pass away

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

Also possibilities: -Trump passes away -Trump leaves the country -Trump runs but loses, and Haley gets "told you so" status as the GOP likely tosses Trump under the bus for delivering so many consecutive losses (2018, his own in 2020, and to some extent the weak 2022 performance can be attributed to his election denial and the party rallying behind that). If the GOP loses in 2024, then I could easily see the party decide they must go 'beyond Trump', and politicians that consistently looked 'anti-Trump' may be in a strong position in that scenario.

Seeing as she is in her early 50s, which is downright an infant by the standards of the presidential race, she can afford to run a long game of prepping for a likely 2028 race.

Of course if Trump wins in 2024, her political career won't go anywhere, but it's a fair bet to plan for the contingency of him losing.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 6 months ago (5 children)

If current disqualifications hold, Trump will have lost access to 33 electoral college votes and needs 270 to win. Assuming it's Trump vs Biden in the general, that's almost half a California.

2020 went 306-232. Trump won 2016 304-227 partly due to faithless electors.

At the current pace and schedule of the impending Trump trials, and after accounting for judgments already rendered and how those are affecting Republican party bankrolls, it's gonna be a blowout. He's on track to lose another 3 dozen electors by October and that's guessing hyper conservatively

[–] [email protected] 67 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Let's not get comfortable though. We all still need to get out and vote come November.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

Haley is almost as bad for America, and definitely worse for Palestine and Ukraine than Biden, who she is projected to beat. The difference, quite frankly, is just how blatant the corruption will be.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago

In the debates, Haley pretty strongly advocated to sending lethal aid to Ukraine (I guess you could be arguing that sending aid to Ukraine, prolonging the war, is bad for Ukraine).

The entire Republican party is a threat to democracy and human rights at this point in time. Project 2025 will likely go ahead with any Republican president. Crazy right-wing, christo-fascist, and "states rights" civil servants and justices will be appointed, and they'd probably be able to lock Demcrats out of control of the federal government for decades to come (by allowing intense gerrymandering, strategic polling location placement, giving state governments the ability to override voting results, etc).

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago

I don't worry that she will end democracy.

She will do a bunch of dumb Republican stuff and make America objectively worse for a lot of people. But the Republic will survive her presidency at least.

Trump, not so much.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago (10 children)

Correct me if I'm wrong but being removed from the primary ballot has no real standing for general election. It doesn't matter that he can't be on the primary when the GOP has chosen him already. It's just posturing. He hasn't lost any electoral votes.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

You're not wrong.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You're not wrong. However, it's still massively consequential because if he can be taken off the ballot for the primary, he will also be taken off the ballot for the general. It will be interesting to see how SCOTUS rules. Will they decide to create a new legal test at the federal level? Will they throw it back to Congress? Since they supposedly love states rights so much, will they leave it up to each state to decide?

Each option is incredibly consequential. Option 1 allows the Supreme Court to disqualify candidates. Option 2 turns it into a political contest, like an impeachment proceeding. Option 3 is absolute chaos, since we know some states will disingenuously retaliate by removing Biden from their ballot regardless of whether there is any merit to an insurrection charge.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Right. I wasn't trying to say that this isn't setting precedent that will help for later rulings. Let's just not count our chickens before they hatch. Some people are acting like Trump is already down electoral votes because of this, which he isn't. That's the only point I was trying to make l.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago

Trump was never going to win Illinois anyway.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 6 months ago (1 children)

And what do these people think Trump would do about Israel?

[–] [email protected] 21 points 6 months ago (2 children)

They don't care. They just don't want to be an accomplice by voting for Joe Biden.

They're fine if their inaction leads to Trump winning and fucking up Palestine even more.

At least their 'conscience' will be clear.

Dumbfucks.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I'm baffled as to how people can knowingly make things worse and feel good about because what they did was "right". The whole idea that an action can be right despite making things worse for everyone is completely alien to me, but I know that's literally how some people think.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

If they are voting in the primary, I doubt they will skip the general election. It's more than likely a reminder to the administration that their voter base is not happy with the current decision making. If they are protesting stuff like this, they are most likely D voters anyway (over 90 % of D voters are pro-ceasefire vs 53? % for the R voterbase.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

Yeah I'm having a very hard time feeling any comfort with that concept strongly looming.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Very much so, but like many other US states, the urban area (Chicago) is more liberal and the rural areas are conservative. But on balance the whole state is very Blue.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, 80% of the state's population is clustered around Chicago and St Louis. The rest of the state is red af but sparsely populated.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

red af but sparsely populated

A.k.a. light pink

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago
[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Southern Illinois may as well be it's own state. Feels like you're going back in time to some bizzaro land hellscape mix of 1955 and 2005.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Accurate description, but it's quicker to just say "may as well be Indiana".

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

Okay then. Well, it is still good news.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

Crab rave? 🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

Do the rest of them now. The law should be the same across America regarding traitorous insurrectionists.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago
load more comments
view more: next ›