this post was submitted on 12 Apr 2024
11 points (100.0% liked)

Hacker News

2159 readers
86 users here now

A mirror of Hacker News' best submissions.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

They threaten to do this every time... And so like whatever, there are other news aggregators.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

They did this in Canada… it’s a real pain in the ass.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


“If passed, CJPA may result in significant changes to the services we can offer Californians and the traffic we can provide to California publishers,” Jaffer Zaidi, Google VP of global news partnerships, wrote in a blog post announcing the decision.

“The testing process involves removing links to California news websites, potentially covered by CJPA, to measure the impact of the legislation on our product experience.”

An Electronic Frontier Foundation report notes that half of every ad dollar gets eaten up by fees, while subscriptions are subject to app store taxes.

Google alleges that it already drives traffic to publishers and that this sort of legislation favors media conglomerates at the risk of further hollowing out local papers.

A 2023 study estimates that Google would owe US publishers around $10 to 12 billion annually should the Journalism Competition and Preservation Act — a national bill — come into effect.

Ultimately, Google caved and cut a deal with several Australian publishers — and Australia’s success led other countries like the US, UK, Canada, and New Zealand to pursue similar legislation.


The original article contains 406 words, the summary contains 178 words. Saved 56%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!