this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2024
5 points (77.8% liked)

Privacy

31182 readers
1812 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

SimpleX Chat is an instant messenger that is decentralized and doesn't depend on any unique identifiers such as phone numbers or usernames. Users of SimpleX Chat can scan a QR code or click an invite link to participate in group conversations.

-privacyguides.org

It's clearly proving to be the most innovative technology when it comes to decentralized communication, in my opinion.

top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

SimpleX Chat Ltd is a seed stage startup with a lot of user growth in 2022-2023, and a lot of exciting technical and product problems to solve to grow faster.

Run by a VC funded for-profit company. That really should tell you all you need to know. Sorry, but no thanks.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago (3 children)

this is a wrong take for a few reasons, if we're talking about trust.

Also, Signal literally was taking money from the CIA for a decade and also is based in the US anyway, and no one hardly said a word 🀣🀣 "Privacy" activists are a joke lmao. Also signal made a crypto coin and took away features like SMS, but of course they get a free pass for that too. Makes you wonder.

  1. SimpleX is fully open source, verifiable, and audited. If there are changes that are bad, the community will talk about them, and at worst it can be forked

  2. SimpleX has made it clear that they dont want you to trust them. It's decentralised and anyone can run their own relay, and the servers are designed prevent correlation. They also make it very easy to use TOR and multiple circuits. This is contrary to the inferior Signal model where you just have to trust that the centralized Signal org isnt leaking your phone and IP to the feds.

moving towards a decentralised, open, and trustless world is better for everyone. In this kind of system, I really dont give a damn where they are getting their money from, as long as they arent putting crap in the software, and if they do, we will all know about it. But so far they have shown that they are committed to extreme security and privacy, and they obviously arent trying to appeal to normies, so i doubt they would ever even try to put VC-pushed garbage in.

If you want a good app, you will need funding from somewhere. Look at apps like Session that arent funded well. They suck. So I'd rather SimpleX be funded by a VC instead of by the feds like Signal, as long as everything stays open, free, trustless, and decentralised

Time to get downvoted! See you guys at -50 😁

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Where did I even mention Signal? Total strawman argument, as I don't think Signal is a good option either.

But you go ahead and trust Simplex Chat Ltd. I guess some people only learn from their own mistakes πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

you completely ignored what i said, as I specifically argued that simplex is made to be used without trust. so dont talk about me trusting people lol.

Also I agree with you on Signal, was just throwing it out there for others, not necessarily for you.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago

You walked right into my deliberate rethorical trap πŸ˜…

There is no such thing as trustless computing, and anyone that tries to sell you that is scamming you or drank the same kool-aid.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Exactly what I thought; if the technology is so decentralized does it make sense to care so much about who finances the project? Like if one instance of lemmy was funded by Microsoft, we could easily use another one and block it, right?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

yeah it's like TOR. it's public knowledge that it was both made and is funded by the US Gov, but we all see it as the standard of anonymity online because everything is open, trustless, and decentralized.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I recommend to study how TOR works

[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago

I did. Can you maybe answer the question?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago

I'm in full agreement with you. Not even a little bit of disagreement.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

I'd definitely use it if my friends were using it. Sadly, I can't even get them to use signal.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

My friends barely want to use Signal. There's no chance they're using something else.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Never heard and don't know any users. I suspect I'm not alone.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I don't trust for profit venture capital funding, if you want to see where it ends up just Look at how telegram or wickr transitions from being "open" and free to getting stripped of features only to have them become paid only and the wickr sold off to Amazon and ended all non business support...the business model for making a profit off chat applications is bad for users.

Also now that signal supports usernames I have no reason to use anything else even for people I wouldn't want having my real number.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Agreed, this is why I am slowly moving away from Signal. The moment they announced putting in a wallet along their own crypto, was the sign for me to leave.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Any chat protocol without full mutli-device support is not really an option for me https://github.com/simplex-chat/simplex-chat/issues/444.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I think it's just that there are too many options and the communities are so fragmented. I'm trying out simplex but it still feels like beta software. Regardless I'd like to see it succeed so we have a real private alternative that doesn't rely on big tech or shady government sponsorship.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

I liked the fact that it is really easy to self-host.

I tried it with friends on discord and in 10min I had a vps with a server running.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

I've been a fan of SimpleX for a while now. Privacy comes at the cost of convenience, and SimpleX is the most private messaging platform according to this spreadsheet.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I would use it, if there were unified push support.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

What is that and why does it matter?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

unified push works as a stand in for gms on devices without it. it runs in the background & receive the wakeup pings for the apps (in this case simplex) so you only need one websocket open instead of a different background service for each app. hugely reduces battery use.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Session messenger allows you to chat without linking a phone number to your account. It’s what drug dealers use lol.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

What really bothers me about Session is that you effectively cannot selfhost - hosting a node is prohibitively expensive. So seems like the only people who can realistically host a node are crypto bros, big companies and government agencies. Thanks, I would rather stick with IRC/XMPP/Matrix.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It's really not. Requires phone number and is centralized

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

i don't know in what world you're living, but in this world where people think you're (edit: we are) a pain in the ass for refusing to install WhatsApp when everyone is expected to use it for official communication (work + organizations); Signal is great.

I've convinced a couple of dozens of people to use Signal, and only one to keep Simplex as, at least, a backup.

as a caring-about-privacy minority we can invite "them" to Signal. "They" know Signal and TelegramπŸ‘Ž. "They" understand our concerns. "They" for whatever incomprehensible reason keep using WhatsApp 🀷 We're left out of the loop because once "everyone" is on that WhatsApp group, it's tiring for them to send an email or an sms to the exceptional one or two people

[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

In F-Droid, after disabling all anti-features, SimpleX still is listed. Signal never will be due to connecting to GCM or Firebase. Molly is an improvement for Signal but not for untrackable privacy like SimpleX from using a different ID with each individual SimpleX contact.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I hoped Molly leaved the sms feature, that is the only thing I can use as a bait for let my friends switch to signal.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago

No, because SMS code was removed from Signal, I believe Molly would have to fork the code if they try to put it back in.