this post was submitted on 04 May 2024
8 points (100.0% liked)

politics

18866 readers
21 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

It’s worth noting (as I have been for years), private militias are illegal in all fifty states.

This article almost points that out in the linked article regarding some legislation that’s floating around https://www.vice.com/en/article/n7e5xm/democrats-propose-bill-to-neuter-militias

Gun rights organizations and anti-government groups have typically argued that paramilitary activity is constitutionally protected by the Second Amendment’s language about “a well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State.”

But constitutional experts hold that it is not protected. After the violent white supremacist rally in Charlottesville, Virginia in August 2017, a team with Georgetown Law’s Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and Protection (ICAP) sought to examine the legality of the kind of brazen paramilitary activity on display that weekend. They found that all 50 states had some kind of laws on the books, but were rarely enforced.

The team also found that the historical context of “militia” did not mean a private paramilitary group that was answerable only to themselves, but an armed group that predated the National Guard, was first established in the colonies in the 1600s and was meant to be deployed at the behest of the governor. Additionally, McCord told The Trace in an interview two years ago, Supreme Court decisions in 1886 and 2008 found that the Second Amendment did not prohibit states from banning private paramilitary groups.

“Our legislation makes the obvious but essential clarification that these domestic extremists’ paramilitary operations are in no way protected by our Constitution,” Rep Raskin said in a statement regarding Thursday’s bill.

The bill: https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/senate-bill/3589/text

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

Cool, can't wait to get shot by one of these assholes next year.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

…militia extremists have been quietly reorganizing, ramping up recruitment and rhetoric on Facebook—with apparently little concern that Meta will enforce its ban against them

Mmm.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

“We have (and still do) traveled across our country standing up for our constitution, and have met most of you face to face. There's no time like the present to come together and organize our states, to build them stronger with true patriots (not people pretending to be Patriots and using groups for dating sites),” Demere wrote in a post last year.

(emphasis mine)

This part made me LOL. I just imagined the post "white male, 55, virgin, looking for white female, 25, virgin, no kids, will cook, clean, bear my children, support my will to overthrow the American government."

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Isn't this almost exactly how a number of these dudes got catfished by girls who immediately reported them to the FBI? Lmao

"Oh yeah I find facist insurrection like, so hot" "Well well well what a coincidence, I participated in Jan 6 and here's photograpgic evidence"

I'd be so happy if the downfall of these militias came from them being horny idiots.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

Workin smarter not harder

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The following excerpts are unrelated to each other but, as a “movement”, I can’t help but see them as a bunch of drooling imbeciles who lack basic comprehension of facts and reality. Though I’m sure there’s a handful of intelligent people who’ve somehow succumbed to brainwashing.

I mean, this first one would indicate they’re ramping up to protect us from Trump. Their reality is not about patriotism but delusion and cultism.

When the government tries to steal the election again and they think we’ll just sit and take it

Huffman and Demere are also key players in the pro-Confederate movement known as “Heritage, not Hate.”

many of their posts convey a general sense of urgency about the need to prepare for “war” or to “stand up” against many supposed enemies, including drag queens, immigrants, pro-Palestine college students, communists—and the US government.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It's so funny to me that they hate the govt and don't believe anything they say, except that communists are definitely bad! The govt is right about that one thing! 😂

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

And cops are good! They don't trust the government at all, but somehow the enforcement arm of the government can do nothing wrong!