this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2023
177 points (94.9% liked)

politics

18866 readers
21 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
177
Missouri judge declines to block ban on gender-affirming care (thehill.com)
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
10 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

A Missouri law banning gender-affirming health care for transgender minors and some adults will take effect Monday after a circuit court judge on Friday declined to block it.

St. Louis Circuit Court Judge Steven Ohmer on Friday rejected a request to temporarily block the enforcement of Missouri’s gender-affirming care ban, writing in an order that “petitioners have not clearly shown a sufficient threat of irreparable injury absent injunctive relief.”

all 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 51 points 1 year ago (1 children)

writing in an order that “petitioners have not clearly shown a sufficient threat of irreparable injury absent injunctive relief.”

Basically every piece of research we have done on the topic over the last several decades has pointed in the same direction: That timely gender-affirming care improves, and often saves, trans people's lives, both adults and children.

And it's worth pointing out that a blanket ban is not based on clinical merit. A blanket ban doesn't allow the specifics of a patient's case to be considered. It is a statement that gender-affirming care is never appropriate. It is purely ideological, and it will lead to the suffering and death of trans people.

These people have blood on their hands. I hope, one day, that they are held responsible for their actions.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

This judge had to literally be sticking his head in the ground yelling "I'm not listening" to not see a) the literal mountain and decades of research that completely contradict his statement and b) his multitude of colleagues that have blocked these bans already based on this actual evidence.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Conservatism is hate. It is oppression. It is misogyny, racism, bigotry, xenophobia, homophobia, antisemitism and transphobia. Conservatism is inappropriate in all its forms.

Do your part in your daily life to combat conservatism. Teach your children why we don't do business or keep relationships with conservatives. Marginalize hate by marginalizing the hate group.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

This is ridiculous. It's like saying we aren't to stop conversion therapy because there's not enough proof that it's harmful. Of course it is. Of course it's harmful to deny trans people care. What a crock of shit.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:

A Missouri law banning gender-affirming health care for transgender minors and some adults will take effect Monday after a circuit court judge on Friday declined to block it.

St. Louis Circuit Court Judge Steven Ohmer on Friday rejected a request to temporarily block the enforcement of Missouri’s gender-affirming care ban, writing in an order that “petitioners have not clearly shown a sufficient threat of irreparable injury absent injunctive relief.”

The law, Senate Bill 49, prohibits health care providers from administering medications including puberty blockers and hormone replacement therapy to treat gender dysphoria in minors, with an exception carved out for transgender young people who began treatment before Aug. 28.

The measure also bars transgender youths under 18 from receiving gender-affirming surgeries and prohibits MO HealthNet, the state’s Medicaid program, from covering transition-related procedures.

Missouri prisons, jails and correctional centers under the new law are also unable to provide gender-affirming medical care to transgender inmates irrespective of age.

The law, which hit several stumbling blocks before it was able to advance through both chambers of the legislature, will lapse after four years thanks to a “sunset” provision added after hours of closed-door negotiations between party leadership in the state Senate.

The original article contains 627 words, the summary contains 194 words. Saved 69%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!