this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2023
72 points (91.9% liked)

politics

18866 readers
21 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Was it the 2016 GOP primary when a different candidate took a turn leading the polls every few weeks?

Even then it felt like the voters just didn’t like any of the candidates. Feels like the same thing here.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

2012 is probably the year you are thinking about. 2016 IIRC Trump took the lead in the fall and it was more of a churn between Bush/Rubio/Cruz for second.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago

"Drops" sounds like "drops out;" you had me excited for a second.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Yes, they're all also rans. This is competition for VP at best. Also a great showcase of how far off the rails the Republican party had become

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago

A profile-building exercise for 2028.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

A terrible pile of secrets.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Vivek is not gonna win even if Trump doesn't run. Why? Cos he's Indian and the GOP base is inherently racist. It's the same reason the Conservatives in the UK have not chance winning an election with Rishi in charge. Simple, really.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That's a bit of an over simplification of Rishis problems. Sure some racists won't vote for him, but some of the Tory base he should have as banker votes won't as he stabbed Boris in the back and the cult of Boris the Bludger doesn't forget. He's also tainted with the shit of the late stage Tories economy, COVID parties, constant expensive fuck ups with small boat immigration/HS2/NHS/schools/etc., and about to open a massive can of worms with the Indian trade deal and freedom of movement. The latter will annoy racists further and anybody working in the sectors about to be opened up

Plus he's absolutely useless in a debate and regularly goes missing when it's time to make public statements

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I agree with all that. At the same time, I still think that Rishi would lose an election even without those issues because of his race. A lot of Tories will just stay home, I reckon.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They will stay home because he and the Torys have been monumentally shit for a long time now. If racism was that a big a problem outside the internal Tory party votes for leader (which is a pool of approx. 180k people) then he and other PoC would never get in repeatedly as Tory MPs, either for local selection or local elections.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

That's a fair counter point. But there are different stakes between picking a brown MP and a brown PM. It's gonna be easier for a brown Tory MP to win in a safe seat as Rishi did as opposed to winning a general election. The UK is still pretty racist.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I could see Trump picking Vivek as his running mate.

But I don't know enough about him to know if he would be a MAGAt guy or not.