this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2024
41 points (76.6% liked)

Technology

58061 readers
31 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Is there a non-AI model?

I don’t want to pay money and watts for silicon I won’t use

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

It's the kind of thing that in a few years you'll be glad to have because some tasks will be offloaded from the GPU to the NPU, one I can think of is the background blur in video conferencing software or microphone noise suppression

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

GPUs are already really good at those, and GPUs are not a fad.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

GPUs are already good at those things. But NPUs can be better at those things - and probably more energy efficient too - given optimized domain-specific models to work with.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Cpus are already good enough for terminal display, why would I want a GPU? ;)

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago

This but unironically. I'm obsessed with off-grid, low power processing. I don't want a stupid fucking NPU I won't need nor use.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

That's still something that works more than good enough without the use of an NPU. We'll see if better use cases come out in future but I'd still prefer that power and die area go to raw CPU processing power.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

You're likely already paying for silicon you don't use. Take AVX512 instructions (or other more exotic instructions) for example, or unused PCIe lanes, certain encoders on your GPU etc.

Also, people thinking they have no use for an NPU are almost certainly already using them, for example when taking a photo with their phone.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

It's actually extremely power efficient.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I know they gotta do this to remain competitive and not concede that entire market subsection, but this is just one more product I won't be buying.

Until AI can build me a custom wooden desk or mow my lawn (there's already robots that do that), it's just a novelty.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago

This article is just more like about benchmarks of Ryzen AI 300 vs Snapdragon X Elite vs Intel Ultra, not more than that.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

For a second I thought that was Doom in the thumbnail.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The performance looks surprisingly close to the older 7940HS. Both look good. Shame they didn't do a battery comparison between these two. The 7940HS doesn't meet the Copilot requirements in it's NPU, but I bet must people don't care about that.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Will there be anything left to run it on in Windows 11 that isn't ruined with ads and bloat?