this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2023
546 points (97.9% liked)

politics

18866 readers
21 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 65 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

Holy shit. It only took how many years for someone to actually say the word 'liar'.

He should've been shut down the second Skeletor came up with 'alternative facts' on the white house lawn.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not to be confused with the other GOP Skeletor, Rick Scott.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Rick Scott looks like he wears a skin mask like The Red Skull

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I wouldn't be surprised if he has a room full of them that he took from all the hospitals he defrauded.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

We could use a whole lot more plain-speaking among both our journalists and people in government. Covering up for fascism only helps the fascists.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 57 points 1 year ago (53 children)

Inb4 the apologists try to argue "bbbut trump hasn't been convicted of a being an insurrectionist!". To those people, show me where in the article that's a requirement:

No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

load more comments (53 replies)
[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Has he called her a nasty woman yet, or "not really my type"? That's how we'll know this is getting to him.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I wish a lot more prominent members of society - in politics as well as journalists - would call Republicans, especially donnie Bin Laden a liar. So very tired of the euphemisms in the face of egregious behaviors.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


“Trump is a liar with no respect for the Constitution,” Griswold said in an interview on MSNBC on Saturday.

Griswold and Trump were both named in a recent lawsuit filed by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), which argues that the former president is disqualified from the 2024 ballot under the 14th Amendment’s Section 3 — also dubbed the insurrection clause.

The Washington, D.C.-based watchdog group asked the court to find Trump’s alleged actions related to the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol disqualifying and to bar Griswold from allowing him on the 2024 Republican primary ballot or any futures ballots in the state.

Griswold added on Saturday that she plans to “see this litigation through,” noting that she thinks “it’s good for a court to weigh in” on the issue.

“And Donald Trump incited an insurrection, and there are big constitutional questions around that provision as to whether he is disqualified from the Colorado ballot,” Griswold continued.

“So, we’ll see this litigation through, and ultimately I think it’s important for a court to weigh in to provide guidance.”


The original article contains 310 words, the summary contains 182 words. Saved 41%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

let me guess... right wing media is going to point their crosshairs on this lady in the coming weeks.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›