this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2023
152 points (91.8% liked)

politics

18866 readers
21 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Former President Trump on Monday formally demanded the recusal of the federal judge overseeing his 2020 election subversion case in Washington, D.C.

Trump’s attorneys cited statements U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan made while sentencing two previous Jan. 6 defendants that appeared to reference Trump, arguing the comments create a perception that Chutkan prejudged Trump’s guilt before he was charged.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 75 points 1 year ago

Get fucked, Cheeto chimp!

Lock him up! Lock him up! Lock him up!

[–] [email protected] 54 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I demand trump write a full page ad in the NYT apologizing to America and the world for being such a douchebag racist asshole, and fucking everything up. And then proceed to jail.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He did that once before, when he demanded the death penalty for the Central Park Five, who were wrongfully convicted.

He is a racist piece of shit.

[–] [email protected] 49 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Judges that are going to recuse themselves do so before they take on the case. This is both a stalling tactic and a fundraising technique. He probably already has the fundraising emails ready to go decrying the rigged liberal judge that refuses to recuse.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yup. These meritless motions are done just to make news headlines. Habba, one of Trump's lawyers, was previously fined $1,000,000 for filing frivolous motions for the purpose of political grandstanding.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

The very same.

[–] [email protected] 47 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I do have to say...I'm loving Lemmy just for the crowd. Normally on Reddit, I'd be sorting through a mass of racist shitheads defending their shithead leader for an article like this, but most people here are just having conversations, whether they agree with the position of the linked content or not.

It's nice.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Yeah on here you just have to avoid anything that says hexbear.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Now you done it

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Looks like so far, only 4 racist shitheads have found your comment. Only here, they’re too cowardly to refute your point.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There are a few shitheads on lemmy.world.

Certain subreddits were alright.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago (3 children)

So um...bets on how detailed she goes in her "fuck no" statement? Think it's going to be simple like a sentence or just a "no" or something extended?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No in whatever the shortest way to say no in legalese is

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Legalese needs more words, something like "motion denied" would work.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

It would be nice if they could respond in giphys or video clips. I suggest something like this:

https://inv.tux.pizza/watch?v=S_TYom5_gDk

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The judge should say, "sure. As soon as Clarence Thomas starts recusing himself."

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

As fun as that would be, it would achieve nothing good.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Oh, gawd, I'd love to see that.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Somebody needs his diaper changed!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I imagine the ketchup cleaning crew has been stepped up a notch in the past year or so...

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago

Trump demands a lot of things.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

Lol Clarence Thomas first

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago

Chutkan: Recuse myself? No, I don't think I will, thank you.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Who the fuck is this orange shitstain to demand anything?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

You have no power here! 😅

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He’s in no position do demand anything from anyone. He should be begging for mercy.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Oh course he is trying to make demands. Obviously it's damaging to his case so he wants the recusal.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Former President Trump on Monday formally demanded the recusal of the federal judge overseeing his 2020 election subversion case in Washington, D.C.

“Although Judge Chutkan may genuinely intend to give President Trump a fair trial — and may believe that she can do so — her public statements unavoidably taint these proceedings, regardless of outcome.”

In October 2022, Chutkan chided Ohio Jan. 6 defendant Christine Priola during her sentencing that she and other rioters offered “blind loyalty to one person who, by the way, remains free to this day,” according to a hearing transcript.

Trump has publicly criticized Chutkan before, claiming she “obviously wants me behind bars,” and is “very biased and unfair.” He has also speculated that there is “no way” he will receive a fair trial under the federal judge and previewed he would file the recusal motion.

“Public statements of this sort create a perception of prejudgment incompatible with our justice system,” Trump’s attorneys wrote.

“In a case this widely watched, of such monumental significance, the public must have the utmost confidence that the Court will administer justice neutrally and dispassionately.


The original article contains 537 words, the summary contains 183 words. Saved 66%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

".... cause when you're a star, they let you do it..."

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

When a judge tells you to go fuck yourself do you get lube or not?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

He can demand anything he wants. He's owed nothing.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Awww, keep stomping those little feet of yours, little prezzy. Who's a wittle insurrectionist? Oh that's right, you are. You are!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Someone give that baby a pacifier.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Demands? The criminal donnie Bid Laden is not in the position of demanding jack squat. He can fuck right off.

load more comments
view more: next ›