this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2023
133 points (97.2% liked)

politics

18866 readers
21 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

With the September 30 deadline approaching, House Republicans are hopelessly divided and Kevin McCarthy is struggling to find a way forward.

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 127 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Moderate Republicans ARE NOT being held hostage by the alt-right Freedom Caucus. They could end ALL this nonsense by working with the Democrats instead.

[–] [email protected] 59 points 1 year ago (2 children)

But then the far right Republicans might post mean things about them on Twitter/X and might go on FOX News to call them traitors. So instead, they'll try to hammer out a deal with the Freedom Caucus who's main policy seems to be "if everyone doesn't give us 100% of what we want right now, we'll burn America down."

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"also, what we want is to burn America down... 👉👈"

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Fuck it, the sooner it burns the sooner we can get started rebuilding

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

They'll call for a vote to replace McCarthy if he does that.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Mccarthy wants his mallet though, and he'd probably lose it if he works with the democrats

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Correct. If moderate Republicans want to work with Democrats, the Democrats would help them elect a different Speaker.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

The moderates could actually form a rebellion that would be more effective than that of the far right group, I think. The freedom caucus can block but I don’t think they can elect a different speaker - they would have if they could have - but a moderate Republican + all Dems coalition could elect someone else - even a moderate Republican.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There's always an Arquillian Battle Cruiser, or a Corillian Death Ray, or an intergalactic plague that is about to wipe out all life on this miserable little planet.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Can we flashy thing the Freedom Caucus and convince them that they only thought they were in the House because of swamp gas reflecting off a weather balloon?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Boebert would love it if you flashed her.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You'll definitely get quid pro quo or tit for tat if you will.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

I value my self respect. Not a lot, but enough to nope out of that,

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

quid pro blow or tit for tit

Ftfy

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

From Qevin to Cave-in