this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2023
189 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

58061 readers
31 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Amazon faces potential break-up as FTC finalizes antitrust lawsuit | The FTC is getting ready for the big one::undefined

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 59 points 1 year ago (10 children)

Damn this thread is negative as hell.

I’m one of the most cynical, pessimistic people I know, but not in here.

Kinda wish people’s first reaction were “good,” not “yeah right, remember Bell in the 80’s?”

Maybe I’m naive, but this seems like good news to me. Even if it doesn’t actually result in Amazon being broken up, at least it indicates someone is doing something.

“Don’t let perfection be the enemy of progress” or something like that.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (3 children)

“Don’t let perfection be the enemy of progress” or something like that.

Brings back memories to when Obamacare was announced. Did it go far enough? Hell no. It was a step in the right direction and it was still derided. Those who are ripping down the system brick by brick have a singular vision and understand it's a series of steps to get to their dystopian hellscape. Why are those primary on the left unwilling to accept anything that isn't a fully realized picture of their ideal society?

In fact I'd argue a large part of why the system is falling apart is those who want to see it improved are unwilling to do those small incremental changes for good.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Obamacare did not change any of the fundamental problems with healthcare: the insurance industry.

Useless health insurance admins are still making 6 figures and you're still paying $20 for a bag of saline to justify their salary.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Why are those primary on the left unwilling to accept anything that isn’t a fully realized picture of their ideal society?

Because at this point, it seems more like theater than actual intent.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

The right sure seems convinced we're hurtling leftward with communist dictators like Barrack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and Joe Biden leading the charge with the tenacity of the Bolsheviks of yore. I'm guessing the reality is somewhere in between that and perennial fecklessness.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

What came first, people checking out or the system stopping working for us? Or does it even matter?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Makes me think about how cynicism pervades online communities and media. Seems like a lot of people can't get themselves to hope. People need hope to accomplish anything.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

People are becoming less and less able to be rationalized with.

A lot of valid triggers have put us here. Housing. Inflation. Income inequality. Identity politics. But it's gotten to the point where people are frothing at the mouth. Daily I see a comment about "eat the rich" and anecdotally they're getting more and more aggressive.

We are tipping toward bloodshed unless things change drastically soon which I doubt will happen.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think what people are tired of and endlessly pessimistic about is the baby steps of doing something never seems to end. It never gets to the other side of helping the people. People need to see the end goal of where the baby steps are trying to lead us AND see that the likes of Amazon are not able to move faster than those baby steps to nullify the steps.

A lot of the terminally online have been alive long enough to live through multiple examples of how theses kinds of things tend to work. And thus have to ask themselves "why will this time end any different?" Have to do that enough times and it makes you a jaded cynic.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

at least it indicates someone is doing something.

That is the entire point, and that's where it stops. I have been around long enough to see this happen over and over and over and over again.

Because you're not actually going to do anything when this doesn't go anywhere. Right? Most people will make no changes to their life to work towards the goals they want. Thoughts and prayers on social media, then back to netflix, tiktok, youtube, the latest video games, music festival, whatever.

So the government, who is in bed with corporations, knows they just have to tell you what you want to hear.

Someone is doing something! YAY!!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Progress needs actual progress though, a lot of progressive regulation is put up with absolutely no chance (or intention imo) of going through. It's a bunch of tech regulators with no idea how the tech works throwing out drastic proposals to look heavy handed and tough, because that's what people want to see.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Astroturfing. Amazon has PR teams that come here and sow seeds of "pff it doesn't even matter" in order to make people cynical and complacent.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yeeaah nah, I can absolutely promise you that Amazon PR isn't wasting their time trying to make a few hundred thousand Lemmy users apathetic lol. This is such a crazy level of paranoia

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nice Try, Amazon PR Flunky!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And I would've gotten away with it too, if it weren't for you meddling Lemmings!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I highly doubt that. Regular people have no real ability to effect the outcome, and the majority of people are saying “there’s no way this absolutely bullshit situation gets fixed” not “what is there to fix? Nothing is wrong!”

No company is paying their PR to say “Yeah [we] are real pieces of shit that need to be hacked up and thrown to the wind but [we] are gonna come out of this just fine so suck our cocks.”

That isn’t how PR works. At least not till they hit dictator levels of power.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

PR people aren't stupid. They know how to muddy the water and make efforts like this seem unimportant because it prevents people from galvanizing. Its the divide and conquer strategy.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

I'll believe it when I see it. I work with (not for) Amazon every day at my job and they are miserable e-commerce partners. One change in a code that suddenly and wrongly flags your entire international product offerings and pulls them? Good luck begging the teams of bots to "help" you.

With Amazon you don't even have the power to handle your own legitimate brand's data management -- changes to our listings go through maybe 20% of the time-- but somehow ASIN hijackers can make wild and dangerous changes to them with little issue. Not only that, but Amazon buttfucks you with fees on top of fees, like FBA fees we pay to entrust them to handle our products and returns well, but are wasted as our products are often stolen, broken, or return scammed.

If you can help it and you like not crying in the bathroom at work, avoid Amazon.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Easily one of the worst places I've ever worked for, and I wasn't even in a warehouse. Highest turnover I've ever seen. The reports about the company culture are no joke!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I will believe it when I see it.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah remember when they were going to break up Microsoft? That went great.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, there the FTC was with a clear market that Microsoft would have a monopoly over should the merger go through. They had Microsoft on the ropes, but, before they could finish them, Microsoft pinky promised prices wouldn't go up. And that was that, no threat of a monopoly and the merger could go through.

... the current antitrust ruling guidelines make enforcement basically impossible.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It was more that George w Bush was elected. And cracking down on monopolies is against the code of fascists. Ideally they want to be in charge of all the monopolies. So he more or less called off the suit just as they were about to close in on Microsoft.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

God we need a trustbuster

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (9 children)

We need to do the same with Microsoft and Google

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

And like the other 10 companies that own pretty much every brand in the country.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

But not Apple? The most valuable company in history.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I want to see the same happen to Apple, to many fingers in too many pies.

Their app store, + cell phone, computer, publishing, music store, streaming service, ect ect.

Want to see google, Microsoft, apple, and others all broken up.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Eeeh. Apple's App Store fees can be a bit much, but all told the company doesn't have enough power on any market to warrant such a huge intervention I think. Just forcing them to make their ecosystem more open would be enough. Like how the EU wants to force them to allow 3rd party package managers on iOS.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Luckily the EU wants much more, and already accepted regulation that will be implemented later this year to open all ecosystems up, completely. iMessage will have to provide an open API that provides the same service levels than the native client for example.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Who in the fuck do they think they're fooling? There hasn't been any sort of large corporate antitrust breakup since Bell Systems in the early 80s. They expect us to believe that after 40 years of inaction, suddenly they're going to do their jobs again? This is nothing but pandering to pad approval ratings. I would love to be wrong, but I'm not getting my hopes up.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The FTC has actually been crazy busy this administration - https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases - they're really doing far more than at any other point in my lifetime.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I fully support the FTC burning it all down, but then I read this paragraph, and it did not give me confidence: “The FTC has had Amazon in its sights this year. The company recently agreed to a $5.8 million settlement with the Commission over Ring privacy violations that included employees spying on customers. And in June, the FTC sued Amazon over "deceptive" Prime subscription tactics.”

5.8 million is probably Jeff Bezos’s weekly cheese budget. It’s loose change in his car seat.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Dude, the 80s wasn't 40 years ago...

Damn I got old..

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The 80s will always be 20 years ago. Y2k was ten years ago, the 2010s didn't happen and we're both old.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Damn, there might be a group of us.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yeah I see no way this happens, if they wouldn't involve themselves in Microsoft being a monopoly /anticompetitive they sure as hell ain't going to combat Amazon

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Great, instead of one overvalued company, Jeff Bezos will own majority stakes in multiple overvalued companies.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Nothings going to happen. Its just another headline that FTC will do something but we know how it goes.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

More than half of Amazon's sales come from third-party merchants who this year started paying an average of over 50% commission on every sale, up from 35.2% in 2016, the result of it raising Fulfillment by Amazon fees every year and increasing storage fees.

While paying for Amazon's logistics and advertising services is optional, most merchants consider these, especially advertising, a necessary part of doing business. Moreover, the FTC has reportedly amassed evidence that Amazon disadvantages merchants who don't use the services by giving them lower placements.

Capitalism at its finest... I still remember when Amazon was just a humble online bookstore. How times have changed.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›