this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2022
6 points (87.5% liked)

Asklemmy

43340 readers
2067 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

(I am focusing on the U.S; but posts about other countries are nice.)

Feminism is a social movement that got popular in the previous century; it is a movement that promotes gender equality?

Racial egalitarianism also got popular in the previous century; people were fed up with racial discrimination.

I think egalitarian movements could have easily became popular during this time; egalitarianism promotes the idea that all humans are equal, which is what most civil rights movements focused on; so how did explicitly-stated egalitarian movements manage to not get popular?

top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

They have been and are popular, but such movements are diametrically opposed to the current western world order (imperialist capitalism). There can be no equality under capitalism. The capitalist class, the people who own almost everything and control almost everything, provoke and inflame differences between working people, so that we spend time and energy fighting amongst each other for scraps instead of going after the causes and perpetrators of inequality.

The movements for worker's rights, women's rights, and racial civil rights, etc, were all egalitarian movements, and they included far more people than we're taught today. The history we usually learn about those movements is highly sanitized to remove the revolutionary and class struggle character from those lessons. The capitalists can't allow us workers to know that by organizing together we can have the egalitarian world some of us dream of.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I guess it's easier to rally around a specific facet of it with identifiable victims. Obviously progressive people agree with some form of the idea, even if it's not how the messaging is done.