this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2023
4 points (100.0% liked)

Memes

45132 readers
3258 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ah yes, 2023. The year I wore a pirate hat and touched more grass. Soon they'll be bribing the govt to make going outside illegal.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Soon they'll be bribing the govt to make going outside illegal.

That was 2020

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Stop using chrome. Yes brave is chrome

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Gecko, the underlying engine behind Firefox, is an entirely different code base from Chromium

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But that’s also not private as has been claimed as a reason to go FF. The only reason to use FF is only to not use chrome. Not for all the reasons that chrome is bad.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Tor Browser, LibreWolf, and Arkenfox JS are the most secure and private browsers you can get and they're all based on Firefox. If they're not private enough for you, I don't know what is

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

For the millionth time, Stallman was right.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Yep, you send me html, my browser can interpret it any way that I want it to. If I want to ignore all of the image and script tags, I can. I don't need Chrome or even Chromium. As Stallman says, you should know what is running on your system.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

DRM is stupid because it interferes with paying customers and isn’t effective. If there’s a will there’s a way

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

We saw the mass adoption of the internet, which before was mostly used by a small group of techies. Now we might be heading to a split: The mass walled garden and a separate smaller but free internet.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

"What's internet? It it like Googlenet but worse?"

-Some kid in the future

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hold on, what about Meta and the fediverse?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Meta's new Threads network is supposed to start federating via ActivityPub at some point.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

well, i guess some silver lining is that threads is basically non-existent after its launch. The serious and place to be instances will block threads. If i need to go see something on threads i'll join an instance that allows it, but doubt i'd ever bother.

Didn't even bother checking it out.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wait, Google's doing what now?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

They want to implement a "feature" so websites only load for you, if your browser, OS and hardware are deemed "trustworthy" aka you load every ad and malware that the website wants to shove down your throat.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The rulers figured out the internet is too dangerous to their power. They thought they could control it and us, and they did for a long time, but it's not working anymore. Now they are cracking down on our ability to communicate, to prevent ideas from spreading and taking hold that they cannot tolerate.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

? They’re just following the end game of capitalism, they’re trying to squeeze every last bit of profit out of the internet that they can, it has nothing to do with the internet “threatening” power, they already took care of that with all of the spying laws they passed when the internet started getting popular

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This might be an unpopular and ignorant take.

Services like Reddit, Twitter and Youtube needs to make money somehow. They provide a service that the users enjoy, and it is fair that they want componsation for those services. Aslong as they are upfront with how and what you are paying with I think it is fine, and the user can themself choose not to use the service if they feel like the payment is too high.

It seems like we are whining about not being able to watch quality content for free. Even Lemmy needs donations or kind souls to keep running.

The DRM and Chrome changes might be worse... But in the end it is the same base argument, we need more competition to reduce the price or stop using services we don't like / want to pay for.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I wouldn't say its unpopular, but I do agree its a bit ignorant but not in the probably negative way you mean.

I think its your acceptance that its fundamental that "Business MUST profit and we MUST suffer to allow them to profit"

You're making a huge leap that we need to suffer through all of the internet getting worse just because a corporation wants to profit. Fuck Google, Fuck Reddit, fuck all businesses that fail. Who cares? We owe them nothing.