this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2023
108 points (98.2% liked)

politics

18866 readers
21 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Former President Donald Trump’s renewed focus on repealing and replacing the Affordable Care Act, known colloquially as Obamacare, has alarmed some Republicans scarred by the GOP’s failure to deliver on promises to dismantle the law and who view the issue as a political loser with the American people.

Many on Trump’s team said they were surprised by the former president’s recent declaration on his social media website Truth Social that replacing Obamacare would be a priority of his administration, as Obamacare had not been a focal issue in ongoing policy conversations and the campaign has not yet drafted any kind of health care policy alternative. One Trump adviser told CNN the post came “completely came out of nowhere,” and said the team “has not been talking to him about health care.”

Some Trump advisers who spoke with CNN also conceded that calling for the termination of a health care law that provides millions of Americans coverage and is largely viewed favorably by the public is a political loser going into 2024. Republicans have tried and failed for years to implement substantial changes to Obamacare and the party has largely abandoned efforts to campaign on the issue.

all 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 42 points 9 months ago

It’s easy to forget that as bad as America’s health care system is compared to other developed nations, it was way, way worse before Obamacare. Some people just couldn’t get insurance back then. And not just people with rare diseases. Pregnant women were denied coverage all the time.

And affordable insurance used to have lifetime caps. I remember a young couple in my hometown having to purposely become impoverished enough for Medicaid because their daughter got leukemia and they hit the cap in no time. People with sick kids were literally giving up promising careers and home ownership to bartend and rent as a way to avoid medical debts.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Oh, I bet by now he definitively has a better alternative bill, not.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Just you wait 2 weeks for him to release it. Its going to be the bestest most amazing healthcare bill by far. Some might even say it will be yuge.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Right after infrastructure week.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago

You spelled “insurrection” wrong.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The GOP is afraid of a policy, that lost, being championed by their biggest attraction, who lost, who keeps making promises that will make him lose.

If ever someone asked you to explain what a loser is, the right is a really good example.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

Sore losers at that

[–] [email protected] 21 points 9 months ago (2 children)

100% it’s just the name that he hates. He is such a petty loser.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 9 months ago (1 children)

But it was republicans that named it that.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 9 months ago

"Not like that! We meant it in a bad way!"

[–] [email protected] 12 points 9 months ago

Let’s make a deal then: we can go back to calling it by the original name, RomneyCare, but we also have to include the original provision for a public option.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 9 months ago

Just so you know they haven't given up on making your life worse.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Former President Donald Trump’s renewed focus on repealing and replacing the Affordable Care Act, known colloquially as Obamacare, has alarmed some Republicans scarred by the GOP’s failure to deliver on promises to dismantle the law and who view the issue as a political loser with the American people.

Some Trump advisers who spoke with CNN also conceded that calling for the termination of a health care law that provides millions of Americans coverage and is largely viewed favorably by the public is a political loser going into 2024.

The ad – which features a pediatric nurse who calls Trump’s health care policies “troubling” – will run in media markets in seven states that will be key to Biden’s 2024 electoral map.

If the election is about those two issues in 2024, then Democrats will have a great night in November,”  Ken Spain, a GOP consultant and former communications director for the National Republican Congressional Committee, told CNN.

Advisers to Trump said the catalyst for the former president’s posts was a recent article written by the Wall Street Journal editorial board that raised concerns that patients are seeing higher costs because insurers are using work arounds to an Affordable Care Act rule.

Like many of the policy proposals Trump’s current team is drafting for a potential second term, there are also serious concerns about how the former president could successfully enact them if reelected, acknowledging the necessary obstacles Congress and the courts could pose to a new health care agenda.


The original article contains 951 words, the summary contains 237 words. Saved 75%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!