this post was submitted on 04 Jan 2024
72 points (100.0% liked)

politics

18866 readers
21 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

WASHINGTON (AP) — The United States and 12 allies issued what amounted to a final warning to Houthi rebels on Wednesday to cease their attacks on vessels in the Red Sea or face potential targeted military action.

The Yemen-based militants have carried out at least 23 attacks in response to the Israel-Hamas war in Gaza since Dec. 19.

A senior Biden administration official declined to detail rules of possible engagement if the attacks continue, but underscored that the Iranian-backed Houthis should “not anticipate another warning” from the U.S. and its allies.

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 16 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

US once again threatening jihadis with a good time. Anyone else read the news story about how the Taliban fighters are all depressed to find themselves as civil servants? That's how to deter people.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 8 months ago (1 children)

"Cease your attacks at once or we will put you all into office jobs"

[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Scares the beejesus out of me.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago

Biden, holding a press conference with Bill Gates.
“And to the Houthi rebels, I have only this to say - ‘Hey Jack, if you don’t straighten up and fly right, my buddy Billy here is gonna go over there and teach everyone how to use Excel!’”
Bill Gates sends Steve Balmer instead.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I absolutely love that article. You can just about imagine The Office in Taliban style.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I didn't say jihad. I declared it

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

Ya no. That does not deter them. Just can carry out their human rights violations in the open now. Girls are again forced out of education and into marriage. Many raped. But ya this feels good opinion.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

I find it very weird the US is showing such restraint here.

I get it's because of Saudi truce with the Houthis, but the entire purpose of the vessels being there is to combat exactly this thing. Allowing Iran to wage this proxy terrorism against our own naval vessels is not something id have expected.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I think the hope was that they had the capacity to intercept ALL attacks (missiles, drones) before they actually hit anything. If you can provide an impenetrable shield, you can let your enemies flail against it without needing to spend any political capital in the region, which is the ideal outcome.

The USAs stockpile of military assets is for all intents and purposes infinite. The cost of expenditure is nil. So easily replaced. Honestly, excited to replace because it keeps the industrial complex humming along. The know-how is there to replenish that resource.

Political capital in the middle east? THAT is in shot supply. THAT is hard to build back after it's spent. The know-how isn't there for that resource.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago

This is a great take man. Nothing to add but this is a solid perspective.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

It was a fairly stern warning. It meant "the clock is running".

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


WASHINGTON (AP) — The United States and 12 allies issued what amounted to a final warning to Houthi rebels on Wednesday to cease their attacks on vessels in the Red Sea or face potential targeted military action.

A senior Biden administration official declined to detail rules of possible engagement if the attacks continue, but underscored that the Iranian-backed Houthis should “not anticipate another warning” from the U.S. and its allies.

Separately, the U.S. called on the United Nations Security Council on Wednesday to take action against the Houthis and warned their financier Iran that it has a choice to make about continuing to provide support to the rebels.

At the U.N., U.S. deputy ambassador Christopher Lu said that without Iranian support the Houthis “would struggle to effectively track and strike commercial vessels navigating shipping lanes through the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden.”

Biden last week ordered U.S. airstrikes against Iranian-backed militia groups, including Kataib Hezbollah, after three U.S. servicemembers were injured in a drone attack in northern Iraq.

In November, U.S. fighter jets struck a Kataib Hezbollah operations center and command and control node, following a short-range ballistic missile attack on U.S. forces at Al-Asad Air Base in western Iraq.


The original article contains 752 words, the summary contains 201 words. Saved 73%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!